|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Vote | |||
| Don't Believe: Cotto brought A Hell Of A Fight To Floyd and he's lying |
|
89 | 44.06% |
| I Believe: Cotto came 2 fight but floyd could have made it much easier |
|
113 | 55.94% |
| Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,441
vCash: 500 |
Got into a long discussion with my old boss earlier today and he was saying floyd now is reminding him of RJJ before he lost. Usual floyd stinks his guy out of the ring without absorbing any sort of damage and now all the sudden he wants to "give the fans a rough and exciting fight", it isn't consistent.
My response was maybe floyd did that so he gave the fans one last rock em sock em fight for his fans to remember him by because if he doesn't get pacquiao he probably won't fight anyone any more.... I could be giving floyd too much credit but I actually think he could have made it a boring fight but thats my opinion.... what do you think? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,772
vCash: 500 |
If Floyd could have made it easy he would have done it, but he couldn't. Cotto brought the fight to him. Whenever Floyd was on his bike Cotto cut him off and made him fight. This is what they call damage control.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,933
vCash: 1000 |
No what fighter wants to get into a fire fight if his boxing skills can avoid that ..Don't beleive that for a second and it would also discredit Cotto's effort ..
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Only slightly camp
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: preston England
Posts: 6,436
vCash: 500 |
Yes i think he could of backed off alot more than he did, Not to say Cotto wouldnt of given him just as hard a ride, infact it may of helped Cottos game plan. But yeah he could of been more defensive.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Amateur
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 17,519
vCash: 294 |
I don't believe it. He's been cornered repeatedly throughout his career. He may have made the decision to stand against the ropes at times for strategic reasons, but only because it was either 1. more efficient and effective than scurrying away while Cotto chases, and 2. because Cotto consistently pushed him there and cut off the exits.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Lowering Post Count
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brunoilia, Hehsland
Posts: 51,292
vCash: 7500 |
I believe that Mayweather takes the most rational strategic course of action he can and Cotto has never had a fight in which he hasn't won or busted his opponent up a little bit, including Pacquiao and Mayweather, who are not gods and cannot make every fight easy regardless of their caliber. And fighters who are put up on a ridiculously high pedestal feel the need to bullshit everyone when they don't completely dominate the underdog, even in clear victory. And I believe that is just plain silly, but the way it is. They find a way to deal with unrealistic expectations, appeasing their fans, who have those expectations, with remarks like this. They may even delude themselves into it. It doesn't make it true.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
a little of both. I do remember at times where it felt like Floyd purposely just went to the ropes. I also remember times where Cotto kept backing him up there and kept him trapped pretty well
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Only slightly camp
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: preston England
Posts: 6,436
vCash: 500 |
I dont think he took punishment he didnt need to take, i think against a very good fighter he took what punishment he had to take to put forward his own more offensive than usual game plan.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|