|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Who had a better skillset, Terry Norris, or Michael Nunn? | |||
| Michael Nunn |
|
4 | 40.00% |
| Terry Norris |
|
6 | 60.00% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#3 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,103
vCash: 1000 |
I thought Norris was more sound mechanically while Nunn was more instinct and reflex based.
Some of Nunn's defensive maneuvers would get most guys knocked flat on their asses. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dei Gratie, Ergo Sum quod Sum
Posts: 5,918
vCash: 75 |
I also say Nunn and it is easy to realize he was a pure boxer and being rangy, loose and a well-schooled boxer, he just outboxed opponents such as Starling, even Toney b4 getting caught, Barkley, couldn't deal with Littles style but I believe he won back the WBA SMW title against Liles... Norris was more of a crisp puncher, boxer who was classy but engaged in wars against Waters, Brown, Jackson and of course hit the deck for that reason, I believe he boxed purely only in the Brown rematch and definitely went to hunt down SRL and tryin to hunt Boudouani, was hunted himself.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|