Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum


View Poll Results: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter - 12 Rounds SLUGFEST WAR
Peter KO 13 30.95%
Max KO 26 61.90%
Peter Decision 1 2.38%
Max Decision 2 4.76%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2012, 01:45 PM   #1
Foreman Hook
☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Thugz Mansion
Posts: 4,123
vCash: 600
Default 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

A slugfest war between 2 Crude-Caveman-Sluggers from 70 years apart,,,,

Who takes it???


"Caveman" Peter, 243LBS, 6'2, 77inch Reach [1st Wladdy Klit fight]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

VS

"Bronze Age" Baer, 210LBS, 6'2½, 81inch Reach [Joey Louis fight]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]



Foreman Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!
Foreman Hook is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-04-2012, 02:47 PM   #2
Philly-Tough
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 530
vCash: 500
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

You have to love the technique in that 1st Sam Peters picture. Thats gotta be my laptop screensaver. It was either a flying headbutt or double left hook attempt. Either way he'd walk stright into a Baer barrage and get stopped. And man it woulden't be pretty. Not a bad matched fight though.
Philly-Tough is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 04:30 PM   #3
janitor
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,063
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

The bronze age superseeded the stone age for a reason.

Baer wins.
janitor is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 05:08 PM   #4
junior-soprano
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: the netherlands
Posts: 587
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Quote:
Originally Posted by janitor View Post
The bronze age superseeded the stone age for a reason.

Baer wins.
yes defintely. i believe bear is a little underrated
junior-soprano is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 06:33 PM   #5
RockyJim
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,386
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Baer could hit like HELL...Great right hand...
RockyJim is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 06:45 PM   #6
McGrain
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 37,052
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

I think Peter might be allowed to trundle through to a decision loss.
McGrain is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 06:47 PM   #7
McGrain
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 37,052
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Ah wait, shit, this is washed up Max versus prime Peter (haha, "Prime Peter") I think Peter might be allowed to trundle through to a decision win in that case.
McGrain is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 07:11 PM   #8
he grant
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,529
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Here's what we do know ... Peter fought much bigger guys than Baer and Max fought no one close to Peter in size, strength, power and speed .... who wins ? No idea ... by no means do I think Max Baer is a lock though ..
he grant is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 08:51 PM   #9
apollack
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,518
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Baer was faster, had more overall skill and generalship, and definitely was in better shape. Only thing Peter had more of was sheer size and raw power, but I don't think he was fast enough to take Max. Plus Peter was hittable, got tired fast, didn't throw often, had no combos, and had little footwork. Peter had the proverbial puncher's chance, but that's about it. If he doesn't get Max early, then he's in for a whipping.
apollack is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 11:01 PM   #10
red cobra
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 13,108
vCash: 1000
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Baer would behead Peter.
Max BAAAAAAEEEEEEEERRRRR!!
red cobra is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 02:33 AM   #11
bodhi
So I can die easy ...
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,491
vCash: 1337
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Why would you take the Baer of the Louis fight? Why not the one from the Schmeling or Carnera fight?

Anyway, prime for prime Baer wins. Peter is bigger but that´s mostly fat, in best shape he would be around 220 pounds, perhaps underneath. Because he is carrying around that much excess weight his stamina is quite bad. All he has is power and a good chin. Baer has about as much power, perhaps more, an even better chin, much better stamina and when he takes it serious also better defense, skill and generalship. Baer either wins a clear decision against a bloodied Peter or a stops an exhausted Peter late. Just different class of a fighter.

And yeah, the average fighter Peter fought were bigger. True, but like Peter their size was mostly excess weight. Baer also has his fair share of bigger fighters like Carnera, Galento, Bearcat Wright, De Kuh, Souza, Santa, Williams. And he did very well against these.
bodhi is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 07:48 AM   #12
Azzer85
ATG
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Midlands, UK
Posts: 6,799
vCash: 500
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Because its a Foreman Hook thread, ill say 'Tinkerbell' knocks both of these bums out
Azzer85 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 07:49 AM   #13
Azzer85
ATG
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Midlands, UK
Posts: 6,799
vCash: 500
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly-Tough View Post
You have to love the technique in that 1st Sam Peters picture. Thats gotta be my laptop screensaver. It was either a flying headbutt or double left hook attempt. Either way he'd walk stright into a Baer barrage and get stopped. And man it woulden't be pretty. Not a bad matched fight though.
Just noticed, that picture is very similar to my av
<<<<<<
Azzer85 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 09:32 AM   #14
Foreman Hook
☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Thugz Mansion
Posts: 4,123
vCash: 600
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzer85 View Post
Because its a Foreman Hook thread, ill say 'Tinkerbell' knocks both of these bums out
WAR TINKERBELL!!!


I agree Azzer m8.


Foreman Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!
Foreman Hook is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 10:20 AM   #15
MadcapMaxie
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,406
vCash: 500
Default Re: 1935 Max "Bronze Age" Baer VS 2005 Sam "Caveman" Peter

Shit I meant to pick Max by KO.

It'd be a fair bit similiar to the Galento fight IMO with Peter quiting on his stool after running out of gas/getting his ass beat.
MadcapMaxie is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013