|
|
|
#18 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,929
vCash: 185 |
Not I. . . Those are the rounds where it's next to impossible to justify for Bradley. . . Rounds 1, and 11 were pretty clear Pac rounds IMO as well; but I guess if you tried hard enough you could give them to Bradley. . .
I did think Bradley most definitely won round 2, and 10; and round 12 was 50/50, 60/40 Bradley, which I also gave to Bradley. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 394
vCash: 500 |
I had pac winning but the fight clearly wasn't a blowout the way harold lederman would suggest, he only gave Bradley 2 rounds. Bradley won at least 4rnds and arguably 5 or 6 rounds. Pac should've gotten the win but this is boxing WWE I can't remember when fair was fair in boxing.
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,729
vCash: 500 |
So if it's a "slow" round, Bradley automatically gets the benefit of the doubt even though the fool hardly ever landed a punch and was simply throwing "stay away from me" punches late rounds. GTFO. The reality is, if Pacquiao doesn't press the action, every round will be slow...none of these fools would want engage Pac after tasting that left. Pac bullied the bully.
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 394
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|