|
|
|
#1 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 247
vCash: 75 |
I gave Bradley Round 5. Everyone on here is crying about the 2 judges giving Bradley round 5. I don't know why Bradley himself said he lost round 5.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CccNM-v-dM[/ame] Watch it on mute first, and then watch it with the sound a 2nd time... and you'll see. No jokes, the HBO commentary is biased. So so biased. Pacquiao landed like 2 punches up till 1:00 left in the 5th. Up until then, Bradley was controlling the distance with his jab, throwing 1-2 combinations, landing with the occasional lead right. Pacquiao only THREW 2, in the first 2 minutes (lead lefts). Bradley was peppering him with jabs the whole 3 minutes. Pacquaio snaps Bradleys head back ONCE in the last 1 minute, while throwing combos that don't hit Bradley, but the HBO commentary is going nuts, saying Bradley is retreating, and PAC has too much power..... Bradley is seriously slipping, or blocking most of the punches... Kellerman actually is uses the word "outclassing" which is a joke, Bradley won the round!! The judges weren't swayed by the crowd, and aren't biased like the HBO team. Dudes, this was a close decision, not a robbery. I gave him something like the first 2, the 5th, and at LEAST 3-4 of the last 5 (not exact). You could even give him the 6th too. The HBO team is calling punches that are slipped, or blocked, and ignoring Bradley's counters... Last edited by busstonedfx; 06-11-2012 at 10:55 AM. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,794
vCash: 1132 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Oh you ain't know?
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Harlem, New York
Posts: 5,019
vCash: 1000 |
bradley controlled the action for the maority of the round but in the last minute pacquiao landed serious punches, and therefore stole the round, because he did way more in one minute or less than bradley did the entire two previous minutes, focusing on defense solely and throwing completely ineffective one twos that land on pacquiao's cupped gloves.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Prospect
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 858
vCash: 12596 |
I had it 8-4 to Pacquiao, giving Bradley 7,8,10, and 12. I don't agree with people saying Pacquiao outclassed him but I thought he won the fight pretty clearly.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,992
vCash: 1000 |
The last minute of the round is the key. In the first two minutes, Bradley is throwing quite a few punches but nearly all of them are blocked by Pac. Pac isn't throwing much, and when he does he mostly misses. So not much is happening, but Bradley's workrate (and a few light punches) are winning the round for him. In the last minute, Pac suddenly comes alive and starts fighting, and because not much happened before this point, he is able to take the round by landing some decent shots. His punches also look sharper and more powerful than Bradley's, which was the case all night.
If Bradley vs Pac was scored via the amateur system, then the scoring would make more sense. Professional boxing, however, is more about landing quality shots rather than quantity. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,110
vCash: 364 |
He does.
The round was pretty even for the first two minutes and in my eyes Pacquiao took it in the last minute. In that round he landed the better shots, controlled the pace(Not to full extent, he initiated contact when he wanted to.) and hurt Bradley. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
vCash: 1000 |
I didnt watch the live feed and heard about the decision. I dont care about either of these fighters, or PBF. This round was closer then what I expected from reading these boards. Pac should of had this round with the flurry at the end, I had Bradley up by a whisker before that. Like I said with the flurry PAc won the round but it was close
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,099
vCash: 75 |
Had it 10/10 the first time I saw it. It was very close
The second time, I noticed that Bradleys shots werent really "shots". They were mainly blocked and swathed away by Pacquiao, whereas Pac landed the effective shots. Either way, I had it 8-4 Pac. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 247
vCash: 75 |
Maybe you think so. That's why this sport is subjective
![]() But in all seriousness, when you are outworked all three minutes, and you land like 2 punches amidst a flurry, that most punches are blocked, ducked, or just missed, with a biased commentary, you see things as much wider than they really are... I don't like letting fighters "steal" rounds on my cards, unless it is convincing. You do nothing for 2:30, and land 2 nice lefts in the last 30 seconds, that the crowd and commentators go wild for, doesn't make me ignore the straight rights that were going on for Bradley in the first 2:30. Maybe pacquiao won the rounds that he did win more convincingly, so it makes it seem like a robbery, but there were many full 3 minute rounds (at least 6, and according to 2 ringside professional scorers, there were 7) that Bradley outworked, and won against Pacquiao. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
i had bradley winning round 1... if its the round im thinking of that i scored for bradley he controlled 2:45 of the round and pac comes on strong in the last 10 seconds.. lands a short or 2 but nothing really big that would sway my vote... judging is scored on a round by round basis..
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,794
vCash: 1132 |
Quote:
Oh were is the answer to my post about Tim's look hurt by left hook with 9 seconds left in the round. I remember him walking back to the corner and he looked out of it and i remember his own corner in a panic. Mate that to me is a clear indication someone Power shots are taking effect. Pac won round 5 clearly. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|