06122012, 01:46 PM  #31  
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,763
vCash: 500 
Re: STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible
Quote:


Sponsored Links 
06122012, 01:55 PM  #32  
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,684
vCash: 1847 
Re: STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible
Quote:
your math is off. Assuming a 1/40 chance of Bradley getting the nod, the probability of 2/2 randomly selected judges scoring the fight for Bradley is the joint probability 1/40 * 1/40 = 1/1600. But that's not right either. Because there was a sample of 3. So we need the compute the probability that 2/3 judges scored it for bradley. And the probability of that happening is .0018 (I'll spare you the math) 

06122012, 01:57 PM  #33 
The Artful Dodger
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SBA
Posts: 20,129
vCash: 75 
Re: STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible
his stats made me rewatch rounds 8 and 11. 11 was a definite Timmeh round. emmanuel didn't do too much in 8 outside of landing 23 punches.
I still stand by Timmmeh winning the 1st, 1012th. 8 can arguably go to either. Timmeh at best won 5 rounds. Now only if HBO did their job right, no one would be thinking Timmeh only won like 2 rounds at most 
06122012, 02:07 PM  #35  
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 530
vCash: 500 
Re: STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible
Quote:


06122012, 03:10 PM  #40 
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,362
vCash: 1000 
Re: STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible
I'm pretty sure the blind 74 year old Ford would tell you all of those missed wildly because the arrogant old shit cant admit that he is too old to judge a fight.

06122012, 03:14 PM  #41 
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 781
vCash: 500 
Re: STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible
They should have 7 judges, the two highest extremes and lowest extremes should be thrown out and they should only count the 3 averages

Thread Tools  

