|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: who do you rate higher | |||
| Dempsey |
|
13 | 22.81% |
| Johnson |
|
36 | 63.16% |
| tough to say |
|
8 | 14.04% |
| Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Vic
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Santos
Posts: 8,653
vCash: 1166 |
Iīm interested to know.......
![]() [IMG]********static.boxrec.com/wiki/2/25/Dempsey.Jack.Back2.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]***********.cyberboxingzone.com/images/johnson-jack-22.jpg[/IMG] discuss |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vic
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Santos
Posts: 8,653
vCash: 1166 |
In the past I rated Johnson very high and higher than Dempsey......now ? Iīm not sure anymore.....
They are very close. but I lean towards to Dempsey tbh......he seems better on film IMO, thatīs the main reason to me. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,628
vCash: 500 |
Johnson and IMO it isn't THAT close... They are both all time greats.. I just happen to believe Johnson Greatness is clearly above that of Dempsey's
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 605
vCash: 500 |
Johnson.
I'll defer to someone who actually saw them both fight. Nat Fleischer rated Johnson at #1 and Dempsey #4. I don't know any better than that. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Vic
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Santos
Posts: 8,653
vCash: 1166 |
Oh cīmon.....
Louis was the most dominant fighter of all time in any division....Corbett, with 14 wins in his whole career is clearly not greater than him. Unless he was talking about H2H, which would be hard to argue also because they are all related criterias anyway...but perhaps would make more sense...... Hey, I respect a lot what writers of the old days said....but your argument was just too simple and donīt tell the whole story.... |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,386
vCash: 1000 |
Goto be Johnson
Resume - Johnson, fought everyone in his era, albeit maybe not at the right times. Longevity - Johnson fighting at the top level for 13years Dominance - both pretty dominant, although Johnson more so, Dempsey has more draw/losses near his prime H2H - I'd say Johnson is more complete at figuring out different styles Did he though? Fleischer was 10 when Corbett lost to Fitz, 11 when Corbett lost to Sharkey and 13 when he lost to Jeffries for the first time If he rated Corbett highly it was based on piecing together history, much like we do |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Sweet Scientist
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 444
vCash: 1000 |
Dempsey. I'd argue that many people rate Johnson so high because Fleisher did. Not saying its right or wrong. AP writers or something similar voted Dempsey the best fighter of the first half century.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|