Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum Lounge European British Aussie MMA Classic Training
Go Back   East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum

 
  


View Poll Results: Ketchel v Langford
Ketchel wins 2 14.29%
Langford wins 12 85.71%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-03-2012, 06:24 PM   #16
lufcrazy
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,711
vCash: 330
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcvey View Post
Ketchel was an opium addict by 1910 ,he also had syphilis .There are tales of fighters being paid to take it easy on him by then.Wilson Mizner ,[who took over as Ketchel's manager after Willus Britt died] is supposed to have paid Frank Klaus to go easy in their fight.Even if the tales of fighters being paid to take it easy are just apocryphal,being a druggie and, having syph would indicate that you are definitey not at your best,or would you not agree?
what I'm saying is, I don't believe it to beyond the realm of possibility that ketchel (had he not been murdered) could have returned to top form hence proved a match for langford at 160.
lufcrazy is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-03-2012, 06:30 PM   #17
mcvey
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,716
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lufcrazy View Post
what I'm saying is, I don't believe it to beyond the realm of possibility that ketchel (had he not been murdered) could have returned to top form hence proved a match for langford at 160.
Do you then concede he was slipping ,as I originally stated?

I think he may have come back, though by 1910 Mizner was continually looking for and finding him drunk in brothels.
I doubt strongly that he could have recovered his form, he was a poor trainer at the best of times.
I think Sam would beat him in an honest fight.
mcvey is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 06:51 PM   #18
lufcrazy
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,711
vCash: 330
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcvey View Post
Do you then concede he was slipping ,as I originally stated?

I think he may have come back, though by 1910 Mizner was continually looking for and finding him drunk in brothels.
I doubt strongly that he could have recovered his form, he was a poor trainer at the best of times.
I think Sam would beat him in an honest fight.
This is becoming an issue of semantics here.

I don't disagree with anything you've said though.

The only I disagree with is the notion that it's a foregone conclusion that his slip would continue and thus should be the deciding factor when considering this matchup.
lufcrazy is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 07:07 PM   #19
he grant
Historian/Film Maker
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,476
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

The best Langford , fighting w handcuffs off, crushes the best Ketchel early.
he grant is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2012, 01:44 PM   #20
burt bienstock
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,121
vCash: 500
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

It must be remembered thar when Ketchel fought Langford in April, 191o, Stanley Ketchel weighed about 12 pounds LESS than Langford did... and that is a lot of weight to
spot a 172 pound immortal like Langford...A nd Ketchel was a shot fighter by this time,
on opium and drinking dissipation, so much so he was forced to try to 'recuperate' by a friend's ranch in Missouri, where he met his tragic end shot in the back by a jealous
farmhand Walter Dipley, just 6 months after his fight with Sam Langford...
So, would the 160 pound version of Langford beat the prime Ketchel of 1908 when
Stanislaus was the terror of the MW division ? I have Ketchel a 7-5 favorite over a 160 pound Langford at 160 or less...But P4P I have the much bigger framed Boston Tar Baby...
burt bienstock is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2012, 03:30 PM   #21
LittleRed
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yoknapatawpha
Posts: 2,614
vCash: 475
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Wasn't middleweight 158 in that era?
LittleRed is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2012, 03:41 PM   #22
janitor
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,051
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lufcrazy View Post
did the rematch ever come close to being made?
Tantalisingly close.

It would almost certainly have happened had Ketchel not been murdered.
janitor is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2012, 03:58 PM   #23
lufcrazy
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,711
vCash: 330
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by janitor View Post
Tantalisingly close.

It would almost certainly have happened had Ketchel not been murdered.
And what do you think the odds were of stan sorting himself out and returning back to form?

Given 8 month and a warm up fight against papke I think he could have got back to peak.
lufcrazy is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2012, 04:11 PM   #24
janitor
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,051
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lufcrazy View Post
And what do you think the odds were of stan sorting himself out and returning back to form?

Given 8 month and a warm up fight against papke I think he could have got back to peak.
Hard to say. Some scholars of Ketchel think that he was on the cusp of a very steep decline, but he clearly still had big ambitions.

He was looking at a fight with Sam McVea amongst other things.

It is a tragedy of history, that one of the key fighters who was willing to give black contenders a chance, was taken from us early.
janitor is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2012, 05:24 PM   #25
lufcrazy
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,711
vCash: 330
Default Re: Ketchel v Langford: 1910 20 rounds for the MW title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by janitor View Post
Hard to say. Some scholars of Ketchel think that he was on the cusp of a very steep decline, but he clearly still had big ambitions.

He was looking at a fight with Sam McVea amongst other things.

It is a tragedy of history, that one of the key fighters who was willing to give black contenders a chance, was taken from us early.
I'm not sure we'll ever know the truth on this matter ya know.
lufcrazy is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > Classic Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump








All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013