Is there a collective bias putting "Prime Tyson" over Lewis? - Page 3

MagnaNasakki · 08-11-2012, 03:36 PM

Maybe it's because I was never as enamored with Tyson as everybody else (For a phenom, he sure got hit a lot.), but I think Lewis is clearly greater.

I would, however, rank them fairly close, so I can't dismiss an argument claiming Mike was. He did have a dominant prime.

johnmaff36 · 08-11-2012, 04:00 PM

Tyson's good, Lewis is better. Better resume, longevity and achievements

08-11-2012, 03:36 PM	#31
MagnaNasakki Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,820 vCash: 1000	Re: Is there a collective bias putting "Prime Tyson" over Lewis? Maybe it's because I was never as enamored with Tyson as everybody else (For a phenom, he sure got hit a lot.), but I think Lewis is clearly greater. I would, however, rank them fairly close, so I can't dismiss an argument claiming Mike was. He did have a dominant prime.
Top

08-11-2012, 04:00 PM	#32
johnmaff36 Champion East Side Guru Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: ireland Posts: 6,848 vCash: 1000	Re: Is there a collective bias putting "Prime Tyson" over Lewis? Tyson's good, Lewis is better. Better resume, longevity and achievements
Top