|
|
|
#1 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 125
vCash: 500 |
From what I've seen(in most boxing gyms),the trainers/coach usually taught you to box while greatly emphasized on the importance of fundamentals in boxing.
I read a few months ago that Monte D Cox wrote that Joe Louis was the most fundamentally "correct" heavyweight boxer. I also remember reading one poster (from the boxing scene) mentioned that for a fundamentally correct boxer,Joe Louis sure aged much faster(and more apparent) in the ring when he fought after WWII. Compared to Archie Moore and Jersey Joe Walcott,who despite their advanced age (around 37-42),still managed to give the much younger Rocky Marciano an exciting match(both even managed to knock The Rock down).With Archie Moore managed to win the light-heavyweight title in 1959. The question here is what are your thoughts about a boxing fundamentals?Does good boxing fundamentals helps a boxer to go on when their physical marvel left them? Or a good boxing fundamentals is merely a "correct" way to box and have no influence on a boxers from continuing their boxing career into their advanced age? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 125
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Especially people like Bernard Hopkins,who refused to take the test when challenged by Jean Pascal. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,175
vCash: 500 |
Definitely certain styles work better for a fighter with slowed reflexes and footwork. Larry Holmes would be a perfect example. He could box well against young solid fighters well into his mid 40's. He didnt take the type of punishment that Foreman did in his older age did.
Both Hopkins and Holyfield adapted more of an ugly grappling style in my opinion. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 222
vCash: 500 |
Mike Mccallum. In fact that's the biggest proof of how skilled he was IMO. Athletically speaking he was a different fighter by the time he move to MW IMO. The only thing that kept him going as he did was because of his technique.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,315
vCash: 1000 |
Yeah, McCallum is as good example as any. Just look at his fight against RJJ when old and shot. He got widely outpointed, but certainly didn't cop a beating and it was clear Roy treated him with respect.
Boxing fundamentals allows you attack and defend while minimizing exertion and vulnerability as well as maximizing power and accuracy. Therefore they of course serve you well when you can't rely on great physical ability. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Fighting Zapata
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,454
vCash: 500 |
The success of old second rate 175 hopkins single handedly trolled the fighting ability of an entire generation of light-heavies\super-middles.
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 125
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,877
vCash: 500 |
Ali
Barrera Foreman (from the 90's) De la Hoya..( even though he was losing most of his fights there towards the end) Jersey Joe |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|