Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum Lounge European British Aussie MMA Classic Training
Go Back   East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

 
  


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-22-2012, 10:38 PM   #31
SamO408
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Califas
Posts: 1,256
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

119-109??
Was prolly hard to score the fight for them while they were jerkin off to pac
SamO408 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-22-2012, 10:40 PM   #32
Cage
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 539
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Honestly, its stupid ass posts like these that makes me question why the fuck i even come to this site. . .

and its people like the op that make MMA fags look intelligent

boxing really does have the worst and most idiotic fans of any sport out there. The thread starter, and anyone who agrees with this garbage needs to go chug down some Draino and end themselves
Cage is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 10:44 PM   #33
Hookie
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Greencastle, PA
Posts: 1,970
vCash: 500
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazooka View Post
Bradley won but didnt win by the way fans expect a fighter to win when Pulling off an upset they expect a dominant beat down or a brutal Kayo fans today are not happy with a close decision that favors the underdog its almost an un written requirement to beat him nearly to death or to put the mother fucker in a coma anything less the champ was robbed
Come on man! Pacquiao clearly won the fight even though 2 out of the 3 judges said otherwise. The decision should be reversed but it doesn't look like that's going to happen. I'm not saying it's the worse decision I've ever seen, but it's definately top 5.

Last edited by Hookie; 08-22-2012 at 11:04 PM.
Hookie is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 10:51 PM   #34
acie2g
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 180
vCash: 500
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

first off Bradley came nowhere close to annihilating pac in all honestly neither fighter did much to claim they were a clear winner bradley was aggressive but his punches didn't really do anything pac was stronger but you don't win a fight by only fighting the last 20 seconds of each rds i have no real ties to either fighter and the best i could see it is 115-113 either way
acie2g is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 11:01 PM   #35
SamO408
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Califas
Posts: 1,256
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Honestly, its stupid ass posts like these that makes me question why the fuck i even come to this site. . .

and its people like the op that make MMA fags look intelligent

boxing really does have the worst and most idiotic fans of any sport out there. The thread starter, and anyone who agrees with this garbage needs to go chug down some Draino and end themselves
Relax bro, its called a joke, I didnt know we werent allowed. With that being said, I do think a 119-109 score is way out of line.
And im not sure anyone really believes that bradley annhilated pac. Unless they arent familiar with the definition of the word. It was a fight that pac probably should of won, but the fault is with the judges, not trolling fans. Oh bro, i know plenty off mma fans, and believe me, intellegence is nowhere to be found
SamO408 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 11:41 PM   #36
Boxmaster
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,904
vCash: 750
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy View Post
Leave Bradley alone. This is becoming racist.
A lot of people won in controversy and didn't take heat for months and months like you are giving to Bradley. Let Bradley fight someone else and if you want bet against him if you think he's not that good.
Boxmaster is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 11:54 PM   #37
Julien Sorel
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: In limbo
Posts: 4,557
vCash: 500
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by acie2g View Post
first off Bradley came nowhere close to annihilating pac in all honestly neither fighter did much to claim they were a clear winner bradley was aggressive but his punches didn't really do anything pac was stronger but you don't win a fight by only fighting the last 20 seconds of each rds i have no real ties to either fighter and the best i could see it is 115-113 either way
Its 116-112 pac, I barely accept another scorecard, if I would it would be 115-113 pac.
There is no way bradley didnt lose or pac won a wide ud.
Julien Sorel is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 12:16 AM   #38
Jorrvaskr
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 650
vCash: 500
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Boring style and lack of a personality. That he was the winner of the most infamous boxing robbery of all time doesn't help his cause. I'm a fan of Bradley but he's gonna need a string of exciting fights or some ingenious promoting to win him some new supporters.
Jorrvaskr is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 12:18 AM   #39
locard
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,675
vCash: 495
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Because Bradley is a boring ass, pillow fisted drama queen of a fighter who got away with a gift decission
locard is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 12:32 AM   #40
Florez
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,325
vCash: 500
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan_c View Post
Because Bradley did not win, but there are stubborn posters here like Bazooka who thinks Bradley win.

Danny Flexen, Boxing News: 115-113 Bradley
Cameron Sharpe, Boxing Fancast: 115-115 Draw
Dave Cokin, Lotus Broadcasting Las Vegas: 114-114 Draw
Chris Manix, Sports Illustrated: 115-113 Pacquiao
Lem Satterfield, Ring Magazine: 115-113 Pacquiao
Gordon Marino, The Wall Street Journal: 115-113 Pacquiao
Armando Alvarez, Telemundo: 115-113 Pacquiao
Jake Donovan, ***********.com: 115-113 Pacquiao
Terry Dooley, ***********.com: 115-113 Pacquiao
Franklin McNeil, Newark Star-Ledger: 116-112 Pacquiao
Brett Okamoto, ESPN: 116-112 Pacquiao
Steve Bunce, BoxNation.com/BBC: 116-112 Pacquiao
Andreas Hale, FightNews.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Brian Arman Graham, Sports Illustrated: 116-112 Pacquiao
George Willis, The New York Post: 116-112 Pacquiao
Rick Reeno, ***********.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Robert Morales, Los Angeles Daily News: 116-112 Pacquiao
Ben Thompson, FightHype.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Tim Smith, New York Daily News: 116-112 Pacquiao
Suge Green, On the Grind Boxing Radio: 116-112 Pacquiao
Steve Zemach, The Queensbury Rules.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Michael Nelson, TheCruelestSport.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Tom Gray, SecondsOut.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Joel Sebastionelli, LIITR Box Radio: 116-112 Pacquiao
CheckHook.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
********************: 116-112 Pacquiao
Ricky Hatton: 116-112 Pacquiao
Wayne McCullough: 116-112 Pacquiao
Ken Hissner, DogHouseBoxing.com: 116-112 Pacquiao
Alexander Belenky, Sport-Express.ru: 116-112 Pacquiao
Rob Day, RingNews24.com: 117-112 Pacquiao
Ryan Burton, ***********.com: 117-112 Pacquiao
Matt Youmans, Las Vegas Review-Journal: 117-111 Pacquiao
Graham Houston, FightWriter.com/FightNews.com/ESPN: 117-111 Pacquiao
Stephen Edwards, BoxingTalk.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Kieran Mulvaney, ESPN: 117-111 Pacquiao
Tim Dahlberg, Associated Press: 117-111 Pacquiao
Ron Borges, Boston Herald: 117-111 Pacquiao
Cliff Rold, ***********.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Chris Robinson, ***********.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Steve Carp, Las Vegas Review-Journal: 117-111 Pacquiao
David Mayo, The Grand Rapids Press: 117-111 Pacquiao
Robert Little, BlackSportsOnline.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Jorge Hernandez, The Low Blow.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
David Greisman, ***********.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Benny Henderson, DogHouseBoxing.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Graham Parker, The Guardian (UK): 117-111 Pacquiao
Ed Graney, Las Vegas Review-Journal: 117-111 Pacquiao
Luis Sandoval, ***********.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Jonathan Sakti, Comcast Sports Net Bay Area: 117-111 Pacquiao
Richie Tomasini, Comcast Sports Net Bay Area: 117-111 Pacquiao
Tim Starks, The Queensbury Rules: 117-111 Pacquiao
Champ Ross, DaTruthBoxing.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Lance Pugmire, Los Angeles Times: 117-111 Pacquiao
Darren Velasco, 8CountNews.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Ryan Maquinana, Comcast Sports Net Bay Area: 117-111 Pacquiao
George Diaz, The Orlando Sentinel: 117-111 Pacquiao
Steve Kim, MaxBoxing.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Doug Fischer, Ring Magazine: 117-111 Pacquiao
FightersRated.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Scott Christ, BadLeftHook.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Kevin Iole, Yahoo! Sports: 117-111 Pacquiao
Tommy Gunn, BoxingAsylum.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
NoHoldsBarred.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Gareth Davies, London Telegraph: 117-111 Pacquiao
John Raspanti, DogHouseBoxing.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Ron Lewis, Primetime/BBC: 117-111 Pacquiao
Brent Brookhouse, SBNation.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Jake Emen, ProBoxing-Fans.com: 117-111 Pacquiao
Alexey Sukachev, Sports.ru: 117-111 Pacquiao
Kevin Mitchell, The Guardian (UK): 118-112 Pacquiao
Steve Lillis, BoxNation: 118-111 Pacquiao
Brett Newton, Pound4Pound.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Joseph Herron, FightSaga.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Mark Lyons, 8CountNews.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Danny "Swift" Garcia: 118-110 Pacquiao
Mike Koppinger, Ring Magazine: 118-110 Pacquiao
Gabriel Montoya, MaxBoxing.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Ryan Songalia, Ring Magazine: 118-110 Pacquiao
Robert Ecksel, Boxing.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Pete O'Brien, USA Today: 118-110 Pacquiao
John McCormick, BoxingTalk.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Eric Raskin, TheSweetScience.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Chuck Giampa, Showtime: 118-110 Pacquiao
John Russell, boxing trainer (Buster Douglas trainer): 118-110 Pacquiao
Rich Marotta, KFI Los Angeles: 118-110 Pacquiao
Jeff Mayweather: 118-110 Pacquiao
Ace Freeman, FightFan.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Kelsey McCarson, TheSweetScience.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Mario Cabrera, The Boxing Republic: 118-110 Pacquiao
Ramon Aranda, 3MoreRounds.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Colin Seymour, Examiner.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Nigel Collins, Espn.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Paddy Cronan, On the Grind Boxing Radio: 118-110 Pacquiao
Denzil Stone, OnTheBreak.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Phil Jay, WorldBoxingNews.net: 118-110 Pacquiao
Geoffrey Ciani, EastSideBoxing.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Michael Rosenthal, Ring Magazine: 118-110 Pacquiao
Eugeny Pilipenko, Vringe.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Vadim Zhuk, Championat.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Ken Pollitt, the13thround.com: 118-110 Pacquiao
Ted Sares, Boxing.com: 119-111 Pacquiao
Allen Barra, The Atlantic: 119-110 Pacquiao
Barry Tompkins, Showtime: 119-110 Pacquiao
Vittorio Tafur, The San Francisco Chronicle: 119-109 Pacquiao
Ray Markarian, TheSweetScience.com: 119-109 Pacquiao
Harold Lederman, HBO: 119-109 Pacquiao
Dan Rafael, ESPN: 119-109 Pacquiao
Max Parker, BoxingWatchers.com: 119-109 Pacquiao
Scott Sawitz, Fox Sports/Inside Fights: 119-109 Pacquiao
Leroy Cleveland, FightSaga.com: 119-109 Pacquiao
Michael Woods, ESPN: 119-109 Pacquiao
Michael Marley, BoxingConfidential.com/Examiner.com: 119-109 Pacquiao
Skip Bayless, ESPN: 119-109 Pacquiao
Among the experts above, 111 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 2 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley.
None of the scores for Pacquiao were offered by Philippine media.
The score for Bradley was not provided by American media
This.
Florez is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 12:58 AM   #41
Jack Kollin
Say my name?
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Smokey Mountains
Posts: 493
vCash: 75
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy View Post
Hello Bradley why are you asking us how come your still not popular
Jack Kollin is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 02:16 AM   #42
igor_otsky
Undefeated
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: you is you is
Posts: 9,539
vCash: 140
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Kollin View Post
Hello Bradley why are you asking us how come your still not popular
coz he mad
igor_otsky is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 03:57 AM   #43
Alo2006
R.I.P Sean Taylor
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,383
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy View Post
U don't really believe Bradley annihilated Pac do u?
Alo2006 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 04:04 AM   #44
McGrain
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63,252
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

I honestly believe that Bradley needs II more than Pac does. He doesn't want to be remembered as the recipient of this generation's most blatant gift, he wants to put that right.


Even if you think Bradley won: you don't make the legacy. Media does. Media says he lost and was gifted.
McGrain is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 04:12 AM   #45
whirlwind
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 269
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Bradley: Why is he not popular even after annihilating PAC?!

Because he didn't win the fight. Only the Floydiots butt lickers think so and they are deluded homo fans so nobody takes them seriously.
whirlwind is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump








All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013