|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vicious & Malicious
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,844
vCash: 1000 |
Possible, but not probable.
I wouldn't be shocked, but I would still go with Hearns to box out a decision. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,645
vCash: 1000 |
He would have won thought. We had this discussion awhile back and most people thought Hearns would be the winner. I really see McCallum taking a decision here. Too skilled, tough, good body punches, slick, etc. A lot of people argue that he wasn't slick because he didn't have great speed but he was slick and hard to hit flush.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,631
vCash: 2666 |
Thomas was a beast at 154, during his time at 154 he tended to box more than look for the KO due to ongoing hand problems. If Hearns jabs, and gets on his bike, and moves well I pick him to win a close decision fighting on the backfoot.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,722
vCash: 330 |
If anyone could do it, it'd be Mike. When I say anyone I mean anyone who has fought in the division.
I wouldn't bet any money on the body snatcher though, Hearns at that division is a favourite over anyone who's fought there imo. Too fast, powerful and skillful. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
weird
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Green Isle
Posts: 13,250
vCash: 82 |
I think Hearns can do it. Not only does he possess handspeed, accuracy, great body blows himself, concussive power, an ATG jab with possibly the greatest right hand of all time, but he's smart also. And tall. McCallum is definitely in this fight, though. Great technical battle.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,314
vCash: 1000 |
At 154 it's probably Kalule, McCrory and Jackson. He didn't look that great against Curry until the KO, but that was probably down to Curry being very, very good. Watson and Kalambay 2 would probably be the picks at 160 besides the Toney fights.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,868
vCash: 500 |
I say Hearns jabs the holy hell outa him droppin that sharp sharp right hand and just out works and out slicks McCallum..Hearns KO in the 8th
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,314
vCash: 1000 |
I find this notion about an invincible Hearns at 154 a bit puzzling. It's really all based on two wins. They were both very impressive, but Duran was a faded former LHW and Benitez (whom Hearns outboxed but never really managed to hurt) was a former WW.
So beating two fighter that were very inferior in terms of physical dimensions makes him invincible even though he became decidedly human when movin up just 6 lbs? Isn't a reasonable conclusion that he could struggle also with JMWs that had dimensions as MWs more or less? If guys like Roldan, Barkley etc could him such trouble at 160, why couldn't for example Mugabi and Jackson do something similar at 154? Mike didn't have their punch, but he was at least as big and much more skilled. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|