boxing
Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2012, 04:43 PM   #1
Boxing Fanatic
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 24,112
vCash: 1000
Default Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

on floyd hype

no catchweight
Boxing Fanatic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-17-2012, 04:45 PM   #2
KOTF
Bingooo
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,726
vCash: 66874
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Is this for a paper belt
KOTF is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 04:47 PM   #3
SHADOW BOX
SHADOW BOX
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,733
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Why no catch weight this time?
SHADOW BOX is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 04:48 PM   #4
Vidic
Rest in Peace Manny
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,609
vCash: 75
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by SHADOW BOX View Post
Why no catch weight this time?
It's more difficult for Juan to fight at the full 147.

Surprised this isn't actually being fought at 150 for Pacs belt.
Vidic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 04:48 PM   #5
bballchump11
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 31,110
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

How about 140
bballchump11 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 04:52 PM   #6
Vidic
Rest in Peace Manny
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,609
vCash: 75
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuropoors View Post

a CW would only benefit Marquez
And that's why it's not at a catchweight.
Vidic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:26 PM   #7
bballchump11
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 31,110
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuropoors View Post
who cares if it was at a CW?

a CW would only benefit Marquez even more.

you *****s need to get over CWs already
catchweights themselves aren't the problem. It's how they're used and how they manipulate weights to favor them
bballchump11 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:28 PM   #8
ThaWiseJester
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,697
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuropoors View Post
who cares if it was at a CW?

a CW would only benefit Marquez even more.

you *****s need to get over CWs already
True,if a fighter takes a risk like Cotto and Oscar they can only blame themselves,they coudl have said no CW and fought someone else..
ThaWiseJester is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:33 PM   #9
bballchump11
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 31,110
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuropoors View Post
Ward-Dawson SHOULD have been at a CW
I think Ward should have went up in weight, but a catchweight would have been fair in that fight
bballchump11 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:35 PM   #10
KOTF
Bingooo
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,726
vCash: 66874
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuropoors View Post
who cares if it was at a CW?

a CW would only benefit Marquez even more.

you *****s need to get over CWs already
At CW it would benefit no one since both Pac and Marquez would weigh around 200 lbs
KOTF is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:38 PM   #11
jeffjoiner
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Trying to make a dollar
Posts: 9,602
vCash: 5174
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

Surprise, surprise. Pac only fights at the weight which will most benefit him.

Cotto? 145
JMM? 147
jeffjoiner is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:51 PM   #12
Uncle Rico
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 19,893
vCash: 75
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

Seriously guys? You honestly think having it at 147 is gonna' make a difference?
Uncle Rico is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:54 PM   #13
puga_ni_nana
Dempsey Roll
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20,930
vCash: 75
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffjoiner View Post
Surprise, surprise. Pac only fights at the weight which will most benefit him.

Cotto? 145
JMM? 147
this is re****ed. why did cotto fought malignaggi at 140?
puga_ni_nana is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:55 PM   #14
PH|LLA
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YUL
Posts: 38,151
vCash: 5685
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

Won't make a difference these guys are the same size. If Pac comes in too heavy it just means he's not in good shape.
PH|LLA is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 05:56 PM   #15
BretN
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,044
vCash: 75
Default Re: Pac-JMM 4 At 147, No Catchweight

Winner will fight Bradley. Boring
BretN is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2015