|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,308
vCash: 773 |
So far from what i've heard about the sparring sessions it sounds like Dempsey wouldn't have had much of a chance if they actually fought. If they did what would be the result k.o, decision ect over 15 rounds? And was there anything Dempsey could do in your opinion to help his chances? [IMG]***********.harrygreb.com/dempsey_greb.gif[/IMG] [IMG]***********.ringwise.com/images/Dempsey-Greb-Sparring-1920.jpg[/IMG]
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 34,759
vCash: 1000 |
"Winning" a very short sparring contest is to a 15 round title fight what night is to day. That should be obvious enough.
On the other hand, you now have to prepare yourself for an avalanche of people telling you Greb had no chance to win, which is strange. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London, England
Posts: 645
vCash: 500 |
Isn't there a quote attributed to Greb somewhere where he admits something along the lines that he didn't think he would beat Dempsey in an actual bout? Or is that hearsay?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,448
vCash: 330 |
I think Greb can certainly win on points.
The weight difference here isn't that big, Greb, from what I've read was quicker, more active and more accurate. Without seeing any footage I can't pick a winner, but I certainly don't agree with those writing Greb off. I also don't agree with those putting much stock in the sparring session. It's a shame, just like the Wills fight, that we hae two greats who competed in this division at the same time as Dempsey and we can't conclusively say who the best man was. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 34,759
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
But in his prime he was confident. No reason not to be really, he tended to do very well against the guys Dempsey had met. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London, England
Posts: 645
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,121
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
What shows here is Dempsey's lack of confidence, in that he wouldnt meet this brazen challenger who would fight him for free |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,137
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
rounds, Dempsey would kill me ",I read several times in old boxing magazines of the 1940s... So why did Greb, believing this challenge Dempsey for a bout? He would have made more money for that one bout than a year of fighting town to town, and as the Bio of Greb's book reads ,"Harry Greb was fearless"... |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London, England
Posts: 645
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,137
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Harry Greb as there is today on ESB...Especially after Dempsey kod the Orchard man Carpentier in 1921, who was even bigger than Harry Greb. Would Harry Greb, my favourite fighter of alltimes have had a chance to beat Dempsey, both at their bests ? I believe he had a very slight chance of lasting the distance against a much stronger heavyweight, faster than many middleweights of that time...Harry Greb's main forte was SPEED and his absolute best weight was about 158-65 at most, so Dempsey at 187 or so would outweigh Harry by about 20 pounds...Harry Greb used to say that "I love to fight the big boys, cause they get in their own way"... Dempsey's braintrust figured that to fight a middleweight like Greb would be a no win situation. If Dempsey loses, he loses his title and fortune. If Dempsey kos Greb, people would say," why doesn't Dempsey pick on someone his own size". Truly a no-win situation... |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|