|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: 70's: Ali>Duran? | |||
| Yes |
|
18 | 34.62% |
| No |
|
34 | 65.38% |
| Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Constantly Shadowboxing
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,989
vCash: 75 |
If there was a p4p rating back then would you say Ali was ranked higher than Duran during the 70's?
Marcel Buchanan Thompson De Jesus Palomino vs Foster Quarry Norton Frazier Foreman Shavers discuss Last edited by megavolt; 09-30-2012 at 11:05 PM. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,072
vCash: 1000 |
p4p I'd pick Duran. He was certainly technically better.
In the 70's Ali had contriversal wins over Norton, and he started to win many of his fights by force of will and ability to endure punishment as much as anything else. But the Ali in the 60's was a different story, that's a much harder call. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 763
vCash: 75 |
Ali in the 70's have regressed quite a bit as compare to the 60's version.
In the 70's he got through a lot of battles based off pure will power and chin. Some of the guys he struggled with in the 70's, he would have cleaned out during 63-67. His shockingly good reflexes, speed, footwork and work rate was all diminished. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Constantly Shadowboxing
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,989
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
The 70's wasn't called the "golden era of heavyweights" for nothing |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
ESB good-looking member
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: the few, the proud, the Philippines
Posts: 4,797
vCash: 0 |
The best fighter of the 70's is a toss-up between Duran and Carlos Monzon.
Both guys are legendary and decimated their respective divisions. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Constantly Shadowboxing
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,989
vCash: 75 |
Don't forget I've also purposefully omitted some other names that are still good from Ali's list- I've only put down the ones that packed the most punch really from both sides
Young Ellis Chuvalo Edit: in fact actually I might just take back Marcel- Marcel was a good win when looking in hindsight, but at the time it's not as potent. Kind of like the Bhop/Roy I situation |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Puncher's Chance
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona / Michoacan
Posts: 8,173
vCash: 1400 |
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugGNKHrJXbE&feature=youtube_gdata_player"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugGNKHrJXbE&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/ame]
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 976
vCash: 75 |
P4P is used to weigh up how someone from a different weight division compares. And as Duran was fighting at Lightweight to Welter in the 70s there was no way Ali and him were gonna meet in the middle to fight, so we have to use their records/performance etc. All I can say is Duran was a Warrior but in the 70s there was not the fighters with records like we have today, the same can be said for SRL and Hagler. But as Duran was the one who moved up in weight over the years I give him the Nod above SRL and Hagler.
As for Ali, well in the 70s he fought the who's who of boxing. The Heavyweight division was crammed with great opponents ( Foreman, Frazier, Norton, Lyle and Quarry these guys fought each other and are well known to most boxing fans ) I would of liked to of seen Holmes on Ali's record win or loss. So I guess by that Ali wins best of the 70s against Duran. But Duran for me P4P because of the divisions he went through and the people he fought win or loss |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,833
vCash: 75 |
No, Duran was the fighter of the 1970s, a more effective fighter, a more dominant fighter, and a more skilled operator IMO. That's really saying something, too, considering Ali's brilliance.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|