|
|
|
#16 |
|
Constantly Shadowboxing
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,979
vCash: 75 |
Top dog Rafa Marquez never fought Hasegawa nor Sahaprom #2 and 3 who in fact, did fight each other in the year prior to Marquez moving up for the Vasquez match. So is it null even though they became the defacto #1 and 2 due to a miniscule timing difference? Add to the fact that the next number #3 in Sydorenko got brutalized by Donaire directly and Rafa ended up losing to Nishioka anyway so...
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Constantly Shadowboxing
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,979
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
most casual fans that hear armstrong, immediately recall the 3 concurrent titles he held- numbers make a difference |
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
GolovKING
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,132
vCash: 2577 |
Quote:
Briggs didn't win anything. Though Foreman didn't represent it too well in terms of opposition after beating Moorer. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 9,243
vCash: 807 |
Lineal title, especially with the Ring's recent rule changes for lineal titles plus overall questionable ranking decisions, lineal title means nothing more than what each fan individually views.
At this point, being "the best guy" regardless of paper trail means more. Plenty of people think Huck/Ross/Afolabi/Lebedev are better than YPH, that Matthysse is better than Garcia, and that a whole slew of flyweights are better than Igarashi. |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,711
vCash: 330 |
Quote:
At one point in time Armstrong was the consensus best from FW-WW, that's astonishing, not because of his lineal titles, but because he was the best fighter in 3 of the 8 divisions. Some people say linearity traces back to 1 v 2, some say otherwise, it's all subjective, like almost all of boxing. What's important is not what title a man holds, but whether that man is the best of the bunch of people holding titles in that division. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, OZ.
Posts: 8,255
vCash: 1000 |
It's time for Donaire to step up to the FEATHERWEIGHTERS. Sick and tired of him fighting these scared bums who wont fight.Guys like Gamboa, De leon, Salido will not be afraid to bring it. Pacquiao met some stern opposition up @ 126.If Donaire is legit that's where he would go.
BTW Rigobum is another of these bums that will shell up in the square circle. |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,743
vCash: 1000 |
I dont see how Montiel wasn't the lineal/undisputed champ at 118. Ciso Morales, Hasegawa, then Concepcion. Montiel was on an absolute tear before he faced Donaire.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|