Hopkins vs Moorer 175 - Page 2

TBooze · 10-21-2012, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thistle1

Moore and you don't really have too think about it...

IF all these fights were poosible for BHop, then he would have stayed at L-HW where he started, but no, he dropped down not just 1 division but 2.

Hopkins is the most overated fighter of the last 20 years!

Moore would beat him up!

Moore would, but we are debating Moorer/Hopkins...

Colonel Sanders · 10-21-2012, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TBooze

Moore would, but we are debating Moorer/Hopkins...

Seamus · 10-21-2012, 10:42 PM

Moorer was a beast at LHW with elite power and hand speed. He was also very fundamentally sound. I think he puts 40 something Hopkins (the age at which he fought in the division) on the defensive and in spoiler mode beginning early in the fight. UD for Moorer.

Colonel Sanders · 10-21-2012, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seamus

Moorer was a beast at LHW with elite power and hand speed. He was also very fundamentally sound. I think he puts 40 something Hopkins (the age at which he fought in the division) on the defensive and in spoiler mode beginning early in the fight. UD for Moorer.

he was also a plodding LHW with a shaky chin

he wasn't a beast at LHW, that's a myth, his LHW fights do not support this argument

10-21-2012, 10:42 PM	#18
Seamus Undisputed Champion East Side VIP Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lisboa, Portugal Posts: 10,060 vCash: 1000	Re: Hopkins vs Moorer 175 Moorer was a beast at LHW with elite power and hand speed. He was also very fundamentally sound. I think he puts 40 something Hopkins (the age at which he fought in the division) on the defensive and in spoiler mode beginning early in the fight. UD for Moorer.
Top