|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Who is MMA's GOAT? | |||
| Clearly Fedor |
|
30 | 39.47% |
| Slight edge to Fedor |
|
14 | 18.42% |
| Too close for a definitive call |
|
6 | 7.89% |
| Slight edge to Anderson |
|
9 | 11.84% |
| Clearly Anderson |
|
17 | 22.37% |
| Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk,nottingham
Posts: 578
vCash: 290 |
gsp has a better resume than silva, 2 hall of famers at their peak in penn and hughes(avenged his losses), so wherever silva is in at lists imo gsp is higher
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,441
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
And fuck the UFC. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 589
vCash: 500 |
Fedor has two career defining wins that no one can nitpick. He beat Prime Nog and Crocop at the peak of their careers. Two future HoFers and ATGs.
Anderson has no career defining wins, but his title reign is very impressive, but so was Fedors. He was undefeated for nearly a decade and he was truly the undisputed HW champion. Fedor clearly, but Anderson has more than a chance to take it. If he fights and beats Jon Jones that will surely cement his spot. |
|
|
|
#34 |
|
East Side MMA
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 8,951
vCash: 553 |
Fedor gets the Iron Mike treatment.. I don't focus on two names throughout a resume I look at the big picture.
Fedor crashed and burned, so please check the record books because my man Anderson Silva submitted a guy who punched Fedor out. |
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: sweden
Posts: 6,244
vCash: 75 |
Clearly Fedor he fought everyone not named Randy Couture but we know they wanted that fight but it didnt happen but still his resume is undeniable one of the best and better than Silvas
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,742
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
Both Fedor and Anderson suffered embarrassing losses that they shouldn't have when they weren't at their peak, whether you choose to hold it against them when looking at their overall careers is up to you (I don't) but you can't rip into one guy over his losses and give the other a pass. Fedor has the better wins, Anderson has the deeper resume, either has a case for GOAT but I'm still going with Fedor. |
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Vic
East Side VIP
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Santos
Posts: 13,837
vCash: 1166 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
East Side MMA
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 8,951
vCash: 553 |
Quote:
Fabricio Werdum was not supposed to beat Fedor ![]() It was a shocking upset. No shame in losing, but glossing over 2 TKO and submission losses with 3 cans is not a good look. |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Undetectable
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,802
vCash: 500 |
I think Fedor is more like the Roy Jones Jr of MMA. When Fedor's athleticism declined a bit he became average. But when he was at the top of his game he was unbeatable.
Silva is a bit closer to Ali. He combines the full use of athleticism, heart, and excellent skills. It's nearly a tie between Silva and Fedor but I'm giving a slight edge to Silva due to his intelligence, ability to fight at a high level at an old age, and overall skill set. |
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,520
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
![]() Bigfoot's not even a can, let alone Werdum and fucking Hendo. But I agree that all this "he wasn't Fedor" bullshit is revisionist history. He was entirely capable of beating Werdum, he was heavily favoured to beat Werdum, and the only reason he lost the way he did was because he got sloppy. If Fedor of the Nog fights carelessly leaped right into Werdum's guard and started flailing at him without establishing any kind of base, he would have been submitted too. His technique and motivation had devolved, not his body. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,520
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
![]() Interesting how polarized the votes are too. Out of 38 voters, I am the only one who thinks that you can make a valid case for either man, depending on what aspects of performance you value over others. For example, I personally value longevity and consistency. Others place more significance on how you look on your best night. Different strokes for different folks. ![]()
Last edited by Haggis McJackass; 10-20-2012 at 08:43 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|