|
|
|
#16 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I never sleep, cuz sleep is the cousin of death
Posts: 16,432
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Arguello was just as special as Sanchez the way I saw it. He showed flaws yes, but so did Sanchez, and often. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 12,184
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
A real chess match this one. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,634
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
You said "I don't think any man Sanchez defeated as champion would have been able to beat him in a rematch". The same goes for AA. Let me tell you that AA never lost any of hist titles in the ring. I have no doubts in mine mind that AA would have defeated Sanchez at 126 (I am talking about the AA just before vacating his title) or 135. Why? Take a look at the fight between Sanchez and Gomez, which people talk about being one of his best fights and also Sanchez against Lopez. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,450
vCash: 1000 |
I think SS could outbox AA @ 126, AA would always have trouble with movers/boxers, and SS was maybe the most composed boxer i've ever seen. Stone cold.
At 135 it's hard to tell, because since SS died so young it's impossible to know how he would have filled out later on. AA does seem like he was always more suitable for higher weights though, no question about that. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|