Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History?

Nafflad26 · 11-12-2012, 05:11 AM

How many rounds has Wlad actually lost in his Pro career? Surely he must be the most dominant heavyweight in history? I know he got knocked out 3 times earlier in his career but even in these fights he hardly lost a round (The Sanders fight only last 2 rounds). Even when Peter Dropped him a few times he still won to show how much he'd dominated most of the rounds. In his 13/14 fights as world heavyweight champion he has only lost 2/3 rounds in my opinion.

Earl-hickey · 11-12-2012, 05:15 AM

[IMG]********27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_linusd1EgB1qgv711o2_r1_400.jpg[/IMG]

Claypole · 11-12-2012, 05:15 AM

To make a mark in the history books as being "dominant", it would have be dependant on who he dominated. He's a decent enough fighter, but the opposition has been ****ing lousy in all honesty.

achillesthegreat · 11-12-2012, 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claypole

To make a mark in the history books as being "dominant", it would have be dependant on who he dominated. He's a decent enough fighter, but the opposition has been ****ing lousy in all honesty.

x2

Nafflad26 · 11-12-2012, 05:23 AM

So people don't think because of his size and physical advantages he has taken heavyweight boxing to a new level? Ali, Tyson, Frazier, Foreman etc wouldn't of been big enough to beat Wlad in my opinion.

joegrundy · 11-12-2012, 05:27 AM

I think the Foreman that destroyed Frazier would have beat Wlad quite easily.

Ali obviously would beat him, not sure if Tyson could get to Wlad.

Earl-hickey · 11-12-2012, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nafflad26

So people don't think because of his size and physical advantages he has taken heavyweight boxing to a new level? Ali, Tyson, Frazier, Foreman etc wouldn't of been big enough to beat Wlad in my opinion.

I'm really tired of this argument

If that's what you think then fine, live in ignorance, it really is too stupid a viewpoint to argue with.

How did "little holyfield" beat Bowe?

[ame]***********.youtube.com/watch?v=8ooarvj6f_k[/ame]

WITH CLASS

Manning · 11-12-2012, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finley

Put me in a room full of midgets with no fighting talent and i am pretty sure I would dominate them as well

Wlad is a very good fighter that knows how to use his strengths that is fighting in the most Piss poor heavyweight division for a long long time.

When your closest competition is a blown up cruiserweight and your own brother says it all really.

Yes he us a good fighter but don't overestimate his achievements.

Who is this blown up CW who is his closest competition?

JamieC · 11-12-2012, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manning

Who is this blown up CW who is his closest competition?

come on you know full well, it was a massive fight that was hyped up probably beyond the heights it could reach, sure the fight was a bit of a let down but we'd all watch a rematch

Jean-Marc Mormeck

Earl-hickey · 11-12-2012, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamieC

come on you know full well, it was a massive fight that was hyped up probably beyond the heights it could reach, sure the fight was a bit of a let down but we'd all watch a rematch

Jean-Marc Mormeck

If only "French Tyson" was a few years younger

tezel8764 · 11-12-2012, 06:28 AM

Yeah the French Tyson in his prime would have destroyed Wlad in one round.

kleonkinch · 11-12-2012, 06:59 AM

How can he be the most dominant champion in history when there is another dominant champion fighting at the same time?

11-12-2012, 05:11 AM	#1
Nafflad26 Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 627 vCash: 500	Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? How many rounds has Wlad actually lost in his Pro career? Surely he must be the most dominant heavyweight in history? I know he got knocked out 3 times earlier in his career but even in these fights he hardly lost a round (The Sanders fight only last 2 rounds). Even when Peter Dropped him a few times he still won to show how much he'd dominated most of the rounds. In his 13/14 fights as world heavyweight champion he has only lost 2/3 rounds in my opinion.
Top

11-12-2012, 05:15 AM	#2
Earl-hickey Champion East Side Guru Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 7,025 vCash: 765	Re: Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? [IMG]********27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_linusd1EgB1qgv711o2_r1_400.jpg[/IMG]
Top

11-12-2012, 05:15 AM	#3
Claypole Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Harlow, UK Posts: 3,555 vCash: 922	Re: Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? To make a mark in the history books as being "dominant", it would have be dependant on who he dominated. He's a decent enough fighter, but the opposition has been ****ing lousy in all honesty.
Top

11-12-2012, 05:23 AM	#5
Nafflad26 Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 627 vCash: 500	Re: Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? So people don't think because of his size and physical advantages he has taken heavyweight boxing to a new level? Ali, Tyson, Frazier, Foreman etc wouldn't of been big enough to beat Wlad in my opinion.
Top

11-12-2012, 05:27 AM	#6
joegrundy Contender ESB Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Liverpool Posts: 929 vCash: 2592	Re: Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? I think the Foreman that destroyed Frazier would have beat Wlad quite easily. Ali obviously would beat him, not sure if Tyson could get to Wlad.
Top

11-12-2012, 06:28 AM	#11
tezel8764 Belt holder ESB Addict Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,947 vCash: 527	Re: Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? Yeah the French Tyson in his prime would have destroyed Wlad in one round.
Top

11-12-2012, 06:59 AM	#12
kleonkinch newbie Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 45 vCash: 1000	Re: Wlad the most dominate Heavyweight in History? How can he be the most dominant champion in history when there is another dominant champion fighting at the same time?
Top