|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,173
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
He did go back to Don King after getting out of prison, but Tyson said King offered him the best deal "on paper". 400 million dollar contract and all the champions lined up to fight him including Holyfield. Where Tyson made the biggest mistake was hiring Horne, Holloway and Bright again who he thought were his friends, but really worked for King. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
ATG
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Telford, West Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,198
vCash: 500 |
If Tyson beat Douglas, his personal life would not have changed in any way at all.
What would have changed is....Tyson most likely knuckles down (as he did do after the Douglas loss) Prepares harder for Holyfield which would have his next fight Win/lose or draw, hed then have fought Foreman and possibly Ruddock once. By not losing to Douglas, he would have got his most important fights before he was carted off into prison (and yes, Tyson still would have ended up in prison no matter what) But, by facing holyfield earlier, people would have a more honest appraisal on tysons career rather than judging him on losses against holyfield after 5 years in prison and against Lennox when Tyson was 14 years removed from when he defeated Spinks. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,173
vCash: 500 |
I think if Tyson took the type of beating he took up until the 8th and Douglas didnt get up after the knockdown, it would have still prompted Tyson to get rid of Bright and go to Giachetti. Actually Don King would have most likely pushed for it, because King was going to be facing fighters he didnt have control over, like Holyfield. Holy was guaranteed a shot at Tyson next and was at ringside in Japan when Tyson got his butt kicked.
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,631
vCash: 2666 |
Quote:
When did Tyson ever get up off the canvas to win? |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
broadcasting from a shed
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: sligo, ireland
Posts: 9,601
vCash: 75 |
lets not forget, he would have probably have had to meet douglas in a rematch too....the boxing public would have demanded that i think.
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,533
vCash: 1551 |
Quote:
He was very good in rolling with punches and recovered very fast, but his chin was "just" good. And early in his career it was ok.(when he was around 23) Last edited by dyna; 11-19-2012 at 11:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,533
vCash: 1551 |
Quote:
They fall in love with their power. Ruddock was a skilled guy once... |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,533
vCash: 1551 |
Quote:
Buster had a piston like jab and belongs with the guys who can knockout a fighter with just his jab (Golota, Wlad, Holmes), the uppercut Tyson got was brutal too and the finishing was just perfect. Tyson had a nearly 20 inch thick neck and a granite beard. I believe he had in his peak a better chin than Holyfield but his wars took tolls to that. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
ATG
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Telford, West Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,198
vCash: 500 |
There is nothing impressive, about getting up off the floor to win a fight you were winning anyway
Mike Tyson, never got up off the canvas to win a fight he was losing. Neither did Muhammad Ali, neither did Lennox Lewis, Neither did Evander Holyfield, neither did Riddick Bowe. Whenever Holmes was knocked down, it was in fights he was winning anyway apart from maybe Shavers. Foreman never got up off the canvas to win a fight he was losing either maybe except the Lyle fight. Wladmir also never got up off the canvas to win a fight he was losing. And theres a whole lot more Suddenly, the list is smaller than you think. |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,710
vCash: 1000 |
I think he'd probably have underprepared again and been smashed by Holyfield.
Tyson didn't get the wakeup call from the Douglas fight, the preemptive headmovement, defacto combination punching, footwork, jabbing never really saw the light of day again. Tyson fell in love with his power and threw his bag of tricks away, he never found them again. |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,819
vCash: 1000 |
He'd have stayed with his incompetent camp, and continued to do the wrong things.
Holyfield would have outclassed him to such a degree it would have hurt his legacy. He'd have come up way, way short against the other great heavyweight of his era. Losing to Douglas when he did was ultimately beneficial. People can make excuses as to a fluke loss to a gatekeeper, he left some of the worst fools he was with, and in the Ruddock fights, he showed up in shape, and ready to rock, and in the first one, looked fantastic. It would have made his newfound love for his overrated power worse. Tyson was the most lethal, lightning bolt combination puncher since Joe Louis, and that accounted for his fearsome KO record. Fighting as a one punch stylist, with no body work, and he never looked as frightening again. For the Ruddock fight, back came body work. Back came angles. Back came hellish combinations. His fans bitch about his abandoning all his substance for a pure punching approach, and they really think him bailing out the fight of his life with a single punch makes that attitude BETTER? Tyson isn't beating Holyfield. Period. But to have good chance, he needs to fight the right way, and thats how he fought cornered by Rooney, or how he managed to fight for Ruddock I and to a lesser extent, Ruddock II. He fights Holyfield the way he fought Douglas, or anybody after prison, and he's taking a schooling and a hellish beating. Last edited by MagnaNasakki; 11-19-2012 at 12:27 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|