|
|
|
#3 |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,710
vCash: 330 |
He'd have been knocked out by holyfield in his next fight.
Him at less than hundred percent against a fit hungry motivated holy spells disaster. Holy befuddles him with lateral movement and hard jabs before crushing him with a full blooded combo around the 11th round. Now had he gotten the fight with holy after twice beating Ruddock I'd pick Tyson to win. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,783
vCash: 75 |
Tyson/Holyfield was pencilled in for June 1990. Although at the time I would of picked Leg Iron, 20 odd years of hindsight suggests I would probably of been wrong to do so...
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
weird
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Green Isle
Posts: 13,236
vCash: 82 |
Quote:
Fuck. It took maybe a tiny bit more than simply not fearing Iron Mike to beat him. Did Mitch Green fear him? Jose Ribalta? Razor Ruddock? Larry Holmes? Peter McNeeley? These guys didn't fear Mike, yet they all got their clocks cleaned. He was a skilled destroyer, not a guy who just lucked out when his opponent didn't "fear him." Besides, how many of his challengers legitimately feared him? Yeah, sure, maybe I do, or you do, but we're talking about world champions here. The cream of the crop. I'm sure they'd be extremely nervous but do the elite ever really fear somebody? I don't think so. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,394
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Enough of a wake up call for Tyson and he continues on until the late 90s and remains undefeated, undisputed ... might even get a Klit or two on his victims list. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dallas,Texas.
Posts: 18,257
vCash: 1010 |
matters how he beat him, Being beaten up and winning on that 8th round uppercut would help him, but had he won by 1st round knockout he might have fought Foreman and been stopped, and that would have hurt Mike's legacy worse than Buster did. Like I always said, Mike was greater than George, but George was all wrong for him.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pasadena, California
Posts: 1,142
vCash: 500 |
There's no way a 40 year old Foreman beats Tyson. N o w a y. Stewart made Foreman look a lot prettier than he did.
I truly believe Douglas would have been that wake up call Tyson needed. Maybe he switches back with Rooney, or gets Giachetti, but he takes Holyfield seriously and trains like a demon. Tyson defeats Douglas, Holyfield and then Foreman that November. Ruddock is next up and maybe Stewart or Damiani. He wants out of the game but challenges with Bowe, Mercer, Morrison, Moorer and Lewis await. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: here (duh!)
Posts: 3,481
vCash: 1280 |
I gotta believe anyone who thinks Tyson would have suddenly had an epiphany and turned his life around, reigning until his late thirties before riding off into the sunset, undefeated is really fooling themselves.
Mike was already barbarously wealthy and rated somelike like the third most famous person in the entire world. I don't think anyone on this forum can appreciate what a crazy alternative universe a celebrity of that magnitude lives in, or the obvious detrimental effect it can have on a person's mental health. That kind of money and adulation can drive even the most stable person insane, and Mike was never close to being stable. He was a street kid with no ability to cope with that kind of success. His life was already unraveling in an alarming way and by the time the Spinks fight was over the guy was dropping so many hints about his waning enthusiasm for the sport that Inspector Clouseau could see trouble was brewing for Kid Dynamite. If getting his neck permanently lengthened curtesy of Douglas' uppercut wasn't enough to convince Mike to get his life in order, what makes people think ALMOST losing would do the trick. I just don't understand that logic. But even if I suspend disbelief and accept the premise, I just don't see Mike's rededication to boxing lasting for more than a year or two before the downward spiral would resume. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,141
vCash: 1000 |
Wake up call, my ass.
Anyone who thinks that having a tough fight with Douglas and winning would have made Tyson abandon his wrong path, get on the phone to Kevin Rooney and Bil Cayton, and say "I need your help.Let's get back to where we left off." is indulging in fantasies, AND ignoring everything that happened before and since. It might have made him think about training harder for Holyfield, but how much harder he would have actually trained ? Probably not enough. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,141
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,108
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Disagree. What Tyson would do is the same thing other hitters have done when they manage to get the rare come from behind ko when they're losing. that is to depend on that punch in all subsequent bouts to do the same thing and get the same result. What you end up with is not a guy that buckles down due to a scare. Instead it's prepare less because even if they are behind, they will land sometime and win the bout. As for Tyson, the only time he did it was against Botha. I sure did not see Mike Tyson doubling up his sparring and preperations for his future bouts because of that scare. A chameleon only changes colors. It's still a lizard. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|