|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Who wins and How? | |||
| Marshall by Dec. |
|
5 | 71.43% |
| Marshall by KO |
|
0 | 0% |
| Fox by Dec. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Fox by KO |
|
2 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: a little sun-drenched vinyard 3 hours north by nor-west of Sydney, NSW, Australia...
Posts: 585
vCash: 1000 |
I'm tentativly putting forward Fox by stoppage, based on the sometimes apathetic, sometimes chinny, performances of Marshall, coupled with the assumption that the wilder punching and more instinctive defense of Marshall puts him at a disadvantage.
But thats very tentative, highly speculative and probably underestimating Lloyd Marshall due to some vague 'psychological' insight that he might not perform to his fullest capacity. Marshall could jsut as well turn up in the explosive form of 'that' fight we can see of him in against Charles, so.... |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,509
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,509
vCash: 500 |
"Easy"? I dunno Red. While I don't underrate Marshall, Tiger Jack Fox is one of the most lethal light-heavyweights in history. Look at some of those names on his resume. That guy was no easy day at the office for anyone. Especially for a guy like Marshall, who liked to get in there and test your firepower. It could prove fatal against a guy like Fox.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|