Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2012, 03:11 PM   #1
Gander Tasco
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,642
vCash: 500
Default Pacquiao - ESPN interview

JEREMY SCHAAP:

***Mod edit**

No posting articles in forum!!!

Gander Tasco is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-03-2012, 03:19 PM   #2
GOW7
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Town AZ
Posts: 2,796
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Shit interview. Manny is boring and no one cares he's a fake christian.
GOW7 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:23 PM   #3
dangerousity
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,363
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

That's a lot of religious questions.

SCHAAP: You won't sit here and say he's ducking you?
PACQUIAO: I'm not gonna say bad words.

SCHAAP: Those might be factual words.
PACQUIAO: I'm not gonna say words that can hurt someone. It can hurt their heart.


Pacquiao cares about Floyd health
dangerousity is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:24 PM   #4
Gander Tasco
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,642
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOW7 View Post
Shit interview. Manny is boring and no one cares he's a fake christian.
Sounds like u mad. Was ur ass sore when u woke up this morning.
Gander Tasco is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:26 PM   #5
Rexrapper 1
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 4,564
vCash: 499
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Nothing new. I always wondered why Manny says he has nothing to prove against Bradley but he wanted to rematch Cotto. That sounds a bit strange.
Rexrapper 1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:29 PM   #6
dangerousity
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,363
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexrapper 1 View Post
Nothing new. I always wondered why Manny says he has nothing to prove against Bradley but he wanted to rematch Cotto. That sounds a bit strange.
He had nothing to prove against Cotto either, but he knows that fight makes a shit load more money than Bradley so that fight was for money.

What's more strange is he says he has nothing to prove to Bradley because he knows he won yet he wont say the same for JMM, he just says "He always says he won the fight and I want to prove him wrong", well as if Bradley isn't doing the same thing?

Difference between the two again is, JMM brought in near 1.5mil buys, Bradley barely a mil if that.
dangerousity is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:29 PM   #7
Gander Tasco
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,642
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rexrapper 1 View Post
Nothing new. I always wondered why Manny says he has nothing to prove against Bradley but he wanted to rematch Cotto. That sounds a bit strange.
Not sure if thats true . Arum gave Cotto an offer but that doesnt mean pacquiao made the decision to fight him. They were just weighing the options. And really, between Cotto, Bradley, and JMM - not a whole lot of options there.
Gander Tasco is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:31 PM   #8
Gander Tasco
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9,642
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerousity View Post
He had nothing to prove against Cotto either, but he knows that fight makes a shit load more money than Bradley so that fight was for money.

What's more strange is he says he has nothing to prove to Bradley because he knows he won yet he wont say the same for JMM, he just says "He always says he won the fight and I want to prove him wrong", well as if Bradley isn't doing the same thing?

Difference between the two again is, JMM brought in near 1.5mil buys, Bradley barely a mil if that.
well obviously, the difference is Pacquiao - Marquez were legitimately close fights. Bradley - Pac wasn't , and everybody knows that.
Gander Tasco is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:37 PM   #9
GOW7
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Town AZ
Posts: 2,796
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander Tasco View Post
Sounds like u mad. Was ur ass sore when u woke up this morning.
Why aree you thinking of my ass? Anyhow when this fights numbers arent released it will be because of boring shit like this. Nothing was addressed this interview really minus religion. Honestly this should be posted in the lounge.
GOW7 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:40 PM   #10
dangerousity
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,363
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOW7 View Post
Why aree you thinking of my ass? Anyhow when this fights numbers arent released it will be because of boring shit like this. Nothing was addressed this interview really minus religion. Honestly this should be posted in the lounge.
SO when Roach talks trashs - Hes a scumbag.
When Floyd talks trash - He's a G.
When Pac refuses to talk trash about Floyd - He's a boring kunt.

Flomo logic at its best.
dangerousity is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:41 PM   #11
dangerousity
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,363
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander Tasco View Post
well obviously, the difference is Pacquiao - Marquez were legitimately close fights. Bradley - Pac wasn't , and everybody knows that.
Well my point is he should acknowledge that he wants to rematch JMM because it was a close controversial fight and he wants to prove himself, not say "because JMM is always saying he won the fight". If that's his criteria for a rematch, Bradley deserves one too.
dangerousity is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:42 PM   #12
GOW7
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Town AZ
Posts: 2,796
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerousity View Post
SO when Roach talks trashs - Hes a scumbag.
When Floyd talks trash - He's a G.
When Pac refuses to talk trash about Floyd - He's a boring kunt.

Flomo logic at its best.
What merited floyd to be brought up? i didnt mention him. I'm sorry, maybe this is a good interview.
GOW7 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:48 PM   #13
dangerousity
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,363
vCash: 0
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOW7 View Post
What merited floyd to be brought up? i didnt mention him. I'm sorry, maybe this is a good interview.
Na you're right, it is a shit interview
dangerousity is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:58 PM   #14
GOW7
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Town AZ
Posts: 2,796
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerousity View Post
Na you're right, it is a shit interview
GOW7 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 04:16 PM   #15
prelude
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,958
vCash: 500
Default Re: Pacquiao - ESPN interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerousity View Post
He had nothing to prove against Cotto either, but he knows that fight makes a shit load more money than Bradley so that fight was for money.

What's more strange is he says he has nothing to prove to Bradley because he knows he won yet he wont say the same for JMM, he just says "He always says he won the fight and I want to prove him wrong", well as if Bradley isn't doing the same thing?

Difference between the two again is, JMM brought in near 1.5mil buys, Bradley barely a mil if that.
With the Marquez fights, it's no secret that it could've gone either way. Both are going to claim that they're the winner.
prelude is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013