|
|
|
#4 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,015
vCash: 1551 |
Cotto is a better fighter than Kirkland, there is no doubt about that.
But Kirkland probably beats Cotto. I think it would just be a bad idea. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montenegro
Posts: 4,151
vCash: 461 |
Cotto beats Kirkland no doubt, Kirkland is fan friendly but does not know how to deal with skilled fighters i dont see how he would beat Cotto.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LosAngeles
Posts: 11,441
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
Pacquiao however has run out of Welter opponents and below that offer punching bag status. He's gone though all of them allready and if he wants to fight for a big purse, his options are pretty much limited to Mayweather, Marquez, at welter and below, or he can challenge fighters at 154 lbs like Cotto, Canelo, and Sergio Martinez. If Pacquiao had comparable money making options to fight anyone other than Marquez, we would'nt have this dec 8th fight coming up with Marquez! Thats what the deal is Pactard. Open your eyes and come out of Pactardism!
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|