Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2012, 11:55 PM   #16
Ripper11
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,698
vCash: 1948
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by igor_otsky View Post
so you're bball then?
yeah I thought yall knew
Ripper11 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-07-2012, 12:03 AM   #17
igor_otsky
Undefeated
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: you is you is
Posts: 6,861
vCash: 75
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripper11 View Post
yeah I thought yall knew
no. your posts are shit compared to bball
igor_otsky is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 12:05 AM   #18
Ripper11
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,698
vCash: 1948
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by igor_otsky View Post
no. your posts are shit compared to bball
usually when I'm on this account, I'm on my phone, so I can't write well though out posts
Ripper11 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 01:24 AM   #19
the cobra
Awesomeizationism!
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,988
vCash: 1000
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

They're the same damn size.
the cobra is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 02:20 AM   #20
Godsavethequeen
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 774
vCash: 75
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by bballchump11 View Post
I would actually prefered Pac to go to 140 and challenge Bradley for his belt, but you know how that team likes to use the weight to their advantage all the time
You really are a TARD... Bradley has fought higher than 147 before. Pacquiao is the draw and bigger champion.. On 2 occasions has pacquiao used a catch weight in a title fight Cotto all 2 lbs of it and Margo as there was NO way Pacq would weigh close to 154...
Now lets tal about how fraud willnever dragged up JMM 2 divisions and still cheated him on the scale.

And now it seems you use 2 ( or maybe more alts ) alts WHAT does that say about you?? PHONY
Godsavethequeen is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:07 AM   #21
KnuckleUp99
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,541
vCash: 500
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripper11 View Post
he won the last 3 rounds by "just surviving"



well he is a handsome man
Tim got credit for winning the last 3 rounds....but that doesn't mean that he actually landed enough clean, effective punches to really win those rounds. Just by Tim winning the fight should be enough to just toss out the score cards and take it for what it's worth.....a Robbery. Nothing anyone can do to change that...But those who saw the fight realize the official decision was as bogus as Chavez beating Whitaker.
KnuckleUp99 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:10 AM   #22
KnuckleUp99
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,541
vCash: 500
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by MidniteProwler View Post
I thought it was competitive I had Pac winning 115-113 he hit Pac with some good right hands in the early rounds not just the jab.
I could count on one hand how many rights landed on PAC over the 12 rounds. I remember there was ONE great body shot that Tim landed.....that was it.
KnuckleUp99 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:11 AM   #23
Boxmaster
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,845
vCash: 750
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by MidniteProwler View Post
Bradley would have won fair & square IMO, Bradley is to small for 147 I reckon at 140 he would have rinsed Pac.
I agree. Pac is slippin.
Boxmaster is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:35 AM   #24
PH|LLA
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YUL
Posts: 38,158
vCash: 5685
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

lol Bradley is actually naturally bigger than Pac mofos
PH|LLA is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:39 AM   #25
Ripper11
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,698
vCash: 1948
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godsavethequeen View Post
You really are a TARD... Bradley has fought higher than 147 before. Pacquiao is the draw and bigger champion.. On 2 occasions has pacquiao used a catch weight in a title fight Cotto all 2 lbs of it and Margo as there was NO way Pacq would weigh close to 154...
Now lets tal about how fraud willnever dragged up JMM 2 divisions and still cheated him on the scale.

And now it seems you use 2 ( or maybe more alts ) alts WHAT does that say about you?? PHONY
idc if he's fought there before you TARD. it's not his best weight. And why shit on Floyd for doing exactly what Pacquiao just did and is doing again to Juan

and I only have one alt. It's not like I make it a secret, so it's really irrelevant

Quote:
Originally Posted by KnuckleUp99 View Post
Tim got credit for winning the last 3 rounds....but that doesn't mean that he actually landed enough clean, effective punches to really win those rounds. Just by Tim winning the fight should be enough to just toss out the score cards and take it for what it's worth.....a Robbery. Nothing anyone can do to change that...But those who saw the fight realize the official decision was as bogus as Chavez beating Whitaker.
Bradley landed more effective punches than Pac did in the rounds, so he won them
and just because the result was messed up doesn't mean Bradley wasn't having some success
Ripper11 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 11:40 AM   #26
rodney
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,759
vCash: 1000
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Bradley beats PAC all day long. He has his number. Next time it will be even easier.
rodney is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 12:05 PM   #27
Collie
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,686
vCash: 14000
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

No change to the outcome, Pac win at any weight imo
Collie is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 01:18 PM   #28
dangerousity
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,368
vCash: 105
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Wouldnt have made a difference. Their both more or less the same weight, at 140 it just means Bradley would have to drain some weight, Pac would have to drain some weight, at 147, both can have a full meal and still make weight.

In Pac's latest interview with Byrd he mentions that he still has to eat to maintain his 147 weight and his natural weight is around 142-143. Which I guess would make sense, that's what he comes in to weigh in after a full meal and he doesn't want to dehydrate 3lbs to make 140 for no reason.
dangerousity is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 01:43 PM   #29
Smokin' Joe
~ Dinamita Irlandés ~
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,120
vCash: 1276
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Bradley fought most of his amateur career and early pro career at 147, he's not that small.
Smokin' Joe is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 01:53 PM   #30
KnuckleUp99
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,541
vCash: 500
Default Re: If Pac v Bradley was at 140

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripper11 View Post
idc if he's fought there before you TARD. it's not his best weight. And why shit on Floyd for doing exactly what Pacquiao just did and is doing again to Juan

and I only have one alt. It's not like I make it a secret, so it's really irrelevant


Bradley landed more effective punches than Pac did in the rounds, so he won them
and just because the result was messed up doesn't mean Bradley wasn't having some success
Tim landed more jabs...but his connect percentage was SHIT. He was in retreat mode and was poppin' the jab to maintain distance. PAC was chasing him down and was more efficient and caused more damage.

I didn't say Tim didn't have any success...he went 12 rounds and go the decision. That's about all the success he had...unfortunately the aftermath of his "W" over PAC hasn't been all it's cracked up to be since NO ONE really gives Tim credit for the win.
KnuckleUp99 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013