|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Who was the greater fighter of the 2000's? | |||
| Wladimir |
|
14 | 29.17% |
| Pacquiao |
|
34 | 70.83% |
| Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 356
vCash: 500 |
[IMG]********desmond.imageshack.us/Himg641/scaled.php?server=641&filename=vitali.jpg&res=landing[/IMG]
[IMG]***********.bloguinmedia.com/curation/mainhot/thumbimages/pacquiao-ko-marquez.jpg[/IMG] |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Respect The "U"
Posts: 9,781
vCash: 700 |
They are both greats.
While Wlad has been more dominant, Pac has faced better competition. There is no one on Wlad's resume that could be the equivalent of Marquez. Tough call. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RGV
Posts: 818
vCash: 1000 |
Bullshit thread. Pacman has been more dominant and fought better opposition. I know he just got knocked the fk out but that doesnt dismiss all his accomplishments. If he had lost to a journeyman, it would be a different story. He lost to not only and Mexican ATG but to a boxing ATG... mthrfkn bullsht ESB has become.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
One More Time
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,638
vCash: 357 |
What's all this bullshit about Wlad being more dominant? dominant against who?
Pacquiao had a stretch of dominance stretching an odd 7 years defeating multiple ATG's and beating the likes of Hatton, Cotto, Margarito while Wlad's dominance is made up of wins over the likes of Marius Whack and Jean Marc Mormeck ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,382
vCash: 75 |
Pacquiao and its not even close. Wladimir is a great H2H heavyweight, but his resume is laughable next to Pacquiao's. Wladimir lost fights to Brewster and Sanders in the 2000s - far worse than losing to somebody on Juan Manuel Marquez and Erik Morales's level.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|