The Ring rate Broner #5 P4P

[Jack]

..and yet no mention of Abner Mares at all. Mares has beaten much better fighters than Broner has. What about Froch? He deserves to be ahead of Broner, without doubt. What the **** has Broner done to elevate himself above Donaire?!

I honestly don't think Broner deserves to be ranked ahead of guys like Gamboa and Matthysse. He's not a level above them. ****ing 5th pound for pound is a joke. 6 fights ago, the guy needed a gift to beat Ponce De Leon.

Pathetic. It shows you how being arrogant can influence people.

[iceman71]

Originally Posted by Jack

..and yet no mention of Abner Mares at all. Mares has beaten much better fighters than Broner has. What about Froch? He deserves to be ahead of Broner, without doubt. What the **** has Broner done to elevate himself above Donaire?!

I honestly don't think Broner deserves to be ranked ahead of guys like Gamboa and Matthysse. He's not a level above them. ****ing 5th pound for pound is a joke. 6 fights ago, the guy needed a gift to beat Ponce De Leon.

Pathetic. It shows you how being arrogant can influence people.

froch was just taken apart 2 fights ago.....hardly a reason to be ranked above broner

[Shrewd Operator]

Ye agree, top 5 is for the proven fighters with proven resumes and who have held some significance in the sport for a period of time......its not for loud mouth prospect, realistically Broner is a prospect, he isnt proven vs the elite.

[SugarShane_24]

He's ahead of Donaire.

That's the worst part.

[janeschicken]

Originally Posted by SugarShane_24

He's ahead of Donaire.

That's the worst part.

Haymon and Golden Boy working their magic again.

[PityTheFool]

I rate Broner but this is ridiculous.
Maybe Austin Trout will be top 4 next time.

[Shogun Assassin]

Both him and Guerrero being above Mares and Viloria is some bullshit. Broner is top 20 at best.

[Boxed Ears]

Viloria apparently has to threaten somebody's mama to get in there.

[iceman71]

pound for pound is a mythical top 10 anyway, its only purpose is to cause debate

[C.J.]

Originally Posted by Jack

..and yet no mention of Abner Mares at all. Mares has beaten much better fighters than Broner has. What about Froch? He deserves to be ahead of Broner, without doubt. What the **** has Broner done to elevate himself above Donaire?!

I honestly don't think Broner deserves to be ranked ahead of guys like Gamboa and Matthysse. He's not a level above them. ****ing 5th pound for pound is a joke. 6 fights ago, the guy needed a gift to beat Ponce De Leon.

Pathetic. It shows you how being arrogant can influence people.

The Ring ( Oscar dela Hoya & GBPs mouthpiece ) Used to be THE boxing mag Nowadays it has little credibility

[SugarShane_24]

Where has the true boxing journalists gone?

Nigel Collins
Jeff Ryan
Ivan Goldman
William Detloff

among others.

[Jack]

Originally Posted by Shogun Assassin

Both him and Guerrero being above Mares and Viloria is some bullshit. Broner is top 20 at best.

I think Broner is a possibility for top 20. I don't think he's a lock and I could easily see him being ranked 20-25. Guys like Froch and Matthysse have lost, but that's what happens when you fight at an elite level. I'd rank guys who fights the best, win some and lose some, over guys who haven't fought anyone.

It's bullshit.

There's no way that Broner is the 5th best boxer in the world. None.

[des3995]

Originally Posted by Boxed Ears

Viloria apparently has to threaten somebody's mama to get in there.

Nah. It didn't work with me.

[larsker]

chuck giampa is a goldenboy lapdog

Broner and Guerrero are not p4p material yet, replace those 2 with Mares and Viloria

[Divi253]

Originally Posted by iceman71

pound for pound is a mythical top 10 anyway, its only purpose is to cause debate