No mames Chris John wants JMM - Page 2

Nonito Smoak · 12-13-2012, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IntentionalButt

Oh, and Marquez UD12 John at this point if they met halfway at 135. (John moving up two divisions, Marquez down two)

It'll be yet another "redemptive" moment for Marquez, as he'll probably decisively beat one of the few men holding a legitimate (close, but legitimate) victory over him.

Some will see it as "avenging another robbery", but that's dumb.

I've always chimed in when it comes up. A draw may have been fair representation, but I've watched it a few times and have def scored it to John before, and I think if you scored it for either of them by more than a point it would likely have been John which you did that for (consistently judging the same things across all the rounds).

Atritionist · 12-13-2012, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IntentionalButt

Sort out your thread title.

WTF does "no mames" mean?

It's like saying " Don't bullshit me " that how it's used. But literally it means " don't suck " .

lufcrazy · 12-13-2012, 03:43 PM

I scored it for jmm. Infact the only time I consistently score against jmm is the Floyd fight.

IntentionalButt · 12-13-2012, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nonito Smoak

I've always chimed in when it comes up. A draw may have been fair representation, but I've watched it a few times and have def scored it to John before, and I think if you scored it for either of them by more than a point it would likely have been John which you did that for (consistently judging the same things across all the rounds).

Marquez fans have far more to bitch about in Pacquiao I-III than in the L to John.

locard · 12-13-2012, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IntentionalButt

Oh, and Marquez UD12 John at this point if they met halfway at 135. (John moving up two divisions, Marquez down two)

It'll be yet another "redemptive" moment for Marquez, as he'll probably decisively beat one of the few men holding a legitimate (close, but legitimate) victory over him.

Some will see it as "avenging another robbery", but that's dumb.

so bullshit point deductions are ¨legitimate¨ now?

Juan was victim of homecooking

just like anyone who's ever posed a real threat to the indonesian Sven Ottke

John is fraud, paper champ and a disgrace to boxing

IntentionalButt · 12-13-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lufcrazy

I scored it for jmm. Infact the only time I consistently score against jmm is the Floyd fight.

I hope you mean consistently, as in "thoroughly and completely"?

igor_otsky · 12-13-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IntentionalButt

Don't you mean Javier Duran?

and who the fuck is Javie Duran? Juan lost convincingly so his 1st loss is from Trisha Yearwood.

IntentionalButt · 12-13-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by locard

so bullshit point deductions are ¨legitimate¨ now?

Juan was victim of homecooking

just like anyone who's ever posed a real threat to the indonesian Sven Ottke

John is fraud, paper champ and a disgrace to boxing

The girl in your avatar is cute.

Your trolling isn't.

locard · 12-13-2012, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IntentionalButt

The girl in your avatar is cute.

Your trolling isn't.

Marquez would have edged the fight without the two BULLSHIT point deductions for low blows that he got from John's referee

that's not trolling, that's a fact

SweetHome_Bama · 12-13-2012, 04:17 PM

Chris John UD12.

Marquez won't be able to deal with that slickness and power from John, plus dropping the weight would hurt him.

IntentionalButt · 12-13-2012, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SweetHome_Bama

Chris John UD12.

Marquez won't be able to deal with that slickness and power from John, plus dropping the weight would hurt him.

I think Marquez being hurt from dropping the bulk and John having to punch 11 pounds north of his career max (and mean, and median...dude's been very consistent with his weight for 14 years and is definitely as "comfortable" as one can be in a division at feather...meaning he might not be comfortable at all elsewhere) will cancel each other out. Then it's just down to what each man has going on right now, a true p4p match-up in the sense of "what would happen if you could make them the same size". In that regard, I still hold John in high esteem as a h2h fighter but he is slipping and Marquez is - while far from his best - rejuvenated enough to take this one. He's not the same animal he was last time they met. Far more aggressive now, and with a whole bag of tricks up his sleeve from taking on top-notch opposition. (which John has only seen in doses)

SweetHome_Bama · 12-13-2012, 04:57 PM

I think a more aggressive JMM against John would lead to hurting his chances more than helping.

Plus if John comes up the right way, with a help from something like a angel, the benefit will be in his corner in the physical battle IMHO.

SugarShane_24 · 12-13-2012, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by igor_otsky

and who the fuck is Javie Duran? Juan lost convincingly so his 1st loss is from Trisha Yearwood.

Just so you know my friend, that Duran was Marquez' first fight.

JMM lost by DQ.

And all of you are wrong. Marquez' greatest opponent was a tree. That tree nearly prevented him from turning pro.

Imagine the last headline ever for his career: "Marquez chops tree down and gains redemption"

IntentionalButt · 12-13-2012, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SugarShane_24

Just so you know my friend, that Duran was Marquez' first fight.

JMM lost by DQ.

And all of you are wrong. Marquez' greatest opponent was a tree. That tree nearly prevented him from turning pro.

Imagine the last headline ever for his career: "Marquez chops tree down and gains redemption"

What did six year old Victor Ortiz do to prevent Marquez from turning pro?

gyll · 12-13-2012, 05:14 PM

If John wants it the fight should be at 140 or higher. If he can't make the weight, simply look elsewhere. I'm well aware that John has a win over JMM. But beating the likes of Barrera and Pac has given JMM a place in the ATG rankings whereas John is much lower. I think JMM still beats him at 135 but it's John who has to make all the concessions. Not a bad fight but I think JMM should fight either Garcia or Khan (assuming he improves).

12-13-2012, 03:43 PM	#18
lufcrazy requiescat in pace East Side VIP Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: England, Up North Posts: 22,694 vCash: 330	Re: No mames Chris John wants JMM I scored it for jmm. Infact the only time I consistently score against jmm is the Floyd fight.
Top

12-13-2012, 04:17 PM	#25
SweetHome_Bama The Honorable Judge East Side VIP Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 42,161 vCash: 10918	Re: No mames Chris John wants JMM Chris John UD12. Marquez won't be able to deal with that slickness and power from John, plus dropping the weight would hurt him.
Top

12-13-2012, 04:57 PM	#27
SweetHome_Bama The Honorable Judge East Side VIP Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 42,161 vCash: 10918	Re: No mames Chris John wants JMM I think a more aggressive JMM against John would lead to hurting his chances more than helping. Plus if John comes up the right way, with a help from something like a angel, the benefit will be in his corner in the physical battle IMHO.
Top

12-13-2012, 05:14 PM	#30
gyll Undetectable ESB Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 3,802 vCash: 500	Re: No mames Chris John wants JMM If John wants it the fight should be at 140 or higher. If he can't make the weight, simply look elsewhere. I'm well aware that John has a win over JMM. But beating the likes of Barrera and Pac has given JMM a place in the ATG rankings whereas John is much lower. I think JMM still beats him at 135 but it's John who has to make all the concessions. Not a bad fight but I think JMM should fight either Garcia or Khan (assuming he improves).
Top