Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Australian Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-23-2013, 10:07 AM   #1
Da Voice
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In your couch, stealn' your change
Posts: 2,209
vCash: 500
Default Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

e.g. 6 three minute rounds = 23 minutes (including 1 minute rest between rounds)
Given the clock doesn't stop from Go to O (unless Ref calls time-out) should a downed boxer in final seconds of final round lose by KO 'cos he didn't beat the count?
Da Voice is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-23-2013, 10:33 AM   #2
boxoncottonon
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: In the heart of the Saints...
Posts: 2,310
vCash: 850
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Haven't you done this one already?
boxoncottonon is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 10:58 AM   #3
Da Voice
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In your couch, stealn' your change
Posts: 2,209
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by boxoncottonon View Post
Haven't you done this one already?
Maybe? Given my age, my memory ain't all that crash hot. In recent times I ventured to local Coles to get dunny paper & bought bread & milk instead

Last edited by Da Voice; 01-23-2013 at 11:09 AM.
Da Voice is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 11:40 AM   #4
Da Voice
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In your couch, stealn' your change
Posts: 2,209
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

I probably started this thread 'cos I got farkin tired of ongoing Mundine, de Mori, Leapai shit threads
Da Voice is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:07 PM   #5
nafe
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 97
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Personal Opinion is there should be no saved by the bell. The count should continue and if the boxer can not get to his feet by 10 then the fight should be stopped.

I guess there is an argument on both sides that he would have a minute to recover, but if we are looking out for the boxers health, the fight should stop.
nafe is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:49 PM   #6
LeBeave
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 376
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da Voice View Post
e.g. 6 three minute rounds = 23 minutes (including 1 minute rest between rounds)
Given the clock doesn't stop from Go to O (unless Ref calls time-out) should a downed boxer in final seconds of final round lose by KO 'cos he didn't beat the count?

I don't understand the first part of the question
LeBeave is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 07:40 PM   #7
AdamH
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 268
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

saved by the bell in last round only is correct.

once bell rings fight is over even if referee is at 5 or 6, the fight is ended so the ref stops counting then we go to the cards
AdamH is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 08:17 PM   #8
atigerofold
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Respect-ville.
Posts: 310
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

What is the actual written rule about this ?

Where can we find these rules?

Do the rules change from Alphabet Organisation to another?

Im asking these questions just in case there is a big title fight, and this million to one chance of it happeniing, occurs......I think the last time I saw this happen
was on a Rocky Balboa movie.....
atigerofold is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 08:31 PM   #9
AdamH
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 268
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by atigerofold View Post
What is the actual written rule about this ?

Where can we find these rules?

Do the rules change from Alphabet Organisation to another?

Im asking these questions just in case there is a big title fight, and this million to one chance of it happeniing, occurs......I think the last time I saw this happen
was on a Rocky Balboa movie.....
AdamH is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 09:10 PM   #10
bruiserh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vCash:
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

If a boxer was that hurt he couldnt make a count, would there ever be a situation where a boxer was able to recover sufficently in one minute to be able to fight again? or would they just get cut to shreds early in the next round? My point being is that I'd be very surprise if that situation would ever really save the boxer and give them a chance of winning the fight.
 Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 09:36 PM   #11
AdamH
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 268
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bruiserh View Post
If a boxer was that hurt he couldnt make a count, would there ever be a situation where a boxer was able to recover sufficently in one minute to be able to fight again? or would they just get cut to shreds early in the next round? My point being is that I'd be very surprise if that situation would ever really save the boxer and give them a chance of winning the fight.
i dont know think any sanctioning body has a rule where u can be saved by the bell in any other round than the last. so its irrelevant
AdamH is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 09:42 PM   #12
Straight Shoota
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Back...Way Backkkkk
Posts: 1,097
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Amen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da Voice View Post
I probably started this thread 'cos I got farkin tired of ongoing Mundine, de Mori, Leapai shit threads
Straight Shoota is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 09:58 PM   #13
bruiserh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vCash:
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamH View Post
i dont know think any sanctioning body has a rule where u can be saved by the bell in any other round than the last. so its irrelevant
Ok cheers mate
 Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 04:40 AM   #14
Da Voice
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In your couch, stealn' your change
Posts: 2,209
vCash: 500
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeBeave View Post
I don't understand the first part of the question
In short I'm saying if the fight starts @ 6:00 it ends @ 6:23 not 6:23+
Da Voice is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 05:28 PM   #15
The Spider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vCash:
Default Re: Opinion on KO loss vs. Saved by the bell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamH View Post
saved by the bell in last round only is correct.

once bell rings fight is over even if referee is at 5 or 6, the fight is ended so the ref stops counting then we go to the cards
That's probably the rule-set I prefer, but it does seem to vary by organization and location. Another contentious one is the standing 8 count, which seems to now be broadly adopted. But it wasn't that long ago there were bouts that didn't include it.
 Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > Australian Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013