|
|
|
#35 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,736
vCash: 1000 |
Tarver has 5 inches in height and a sizeable big reach advantage would be too big and all wrong for Galindez. Tarver is more athletic too, Galindez has superior technical skills and stamina but I don't think he matches up too well here mainly due to the issue of size
O/T was Monzon-Galindez ever close to happening? |
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Fighting Zapata
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,453
vCash: 500 |
Tarver was never athletic, power.He was ponderous and slow of hand and foot, nothing special in the workrate or stamina areas.Decent durability i suppose.
I think his best strengths were his heavy handedness and awkward ranginess. I could see him making it an ugly fight if he uses his range and fights cautiously, as Galindez had his tendencies to take portions of rounds off and try and draw fighters in to counter too much.can't see him winning, but. |
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Can you hear this?
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,230
vCash: 1000 |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,064
vCash: 75 |
Monzon had little to offer Conteh, even with the Scouser's relatively short reach.
Monzon would likely put up a more scientific effort in a bout that resembles the Conteh-Lopez bout. The Argie was a perfect middle. |
|
|
|
#39 | ||
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,736
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Tarver at his best generally from Harding 2-Jones 2, aswell as being sharper he looks every bit a big puncher through that stage of his career Either way I'm not saying he's P4P better than Galindez by any means just far bigger at the weight Quote:
He probably matches up better against Galindez, which imo would be his window for 2 weight greatness |
||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|