|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,502
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
![]() By the way, I was going to respond to your post earlier, but didn't want to have five posts in a row on the thread.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St. Catharines Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,603
vCash: 75 |
This whole no number one contender or mandatory challenger is a lot like The Stanley Cup in the 1800's when teams would travel to play the Champion, if they had the money. A team travelled for 4 months I believe from Dawson City, Yukon, to play the Champions, The Ottawa Silver Seven. They didnt beat anyone to get the series, they just contacted Ottawa team, and voila, a shot at the title. If they had won, they would have held the Cup forever, as who was going to travel to The Yukon by Dog Sled???
But since anyone that generates the money can fight for The UFC strap, it is the same as the primitive incantation of the Hockey Championships and The Stanley Cup. At least until hockey became a respectable sport with legitimate champions, and properly contested championship series'. I wonder if The UFC will evolve one day like Hockey did. |
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St. Catharines Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,603
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
So kind of like how an ass kisser at work will get a promotion over a more qualified applicant or employee? I hate ass kisser and brown nosers at work. I really dont want to see those guys in my sports. |
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,502
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
Nobody wanted to see Jon Fitch dry-humping everybody who was put in the cage with him. Nobody got excited to see him fight, or liked the idea of him wearing the belt. But he kept winning, turned himself into the last man standing, and got his shot. If he had exciting fights, if he was more willing to put himself out there and generate interest, he would have gotten his shot sooner. But he's a nice guy, a somewhat bland personality, with a boring fighting style. He's always going to be leapfrogged by an exciting fighter who generates interest and buzz, and fair enough. Besides, "mandatory contenders" are all subjective. There are people here who will tell you that Hendo is the rightful next challenger for Jones. Ignoring the fact that the guy hasn't even fought since 2011. And when he did it was a razor-close decision against a guy who has since been in a back-and-forth war with Brandon Vera of all people, and was also easily steamrolled by Gustafsson. And Henderson has also been injured during that time. How is that deserving of a title shot in March/April 2013? ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,502
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
The UFC, or someone else? If it's the UFC, what really changes? If it's someone else, what right do they have to impose their opinions and rules on a private company? And what happens when someone gets injured and a fight has to be made at late notice?
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,502
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
And Diaz is (for the second time) scheduled to fight GSP. And he's coming off a loss too. How much of an ass-kisser is Nick Diaz? ![]() But fans wanted to see this fight. They've been screaming for GSP to fight Diaz for a couple of years now. The level of fan interest is a LOT higher for Diaz than it is for Hendricks. That makes Diaz the most qualified WW applicant. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Da Bafroom brah!
Posts: 7,191
vCash: 75 |
I think it's more faceted than we are giving it credit for.
We are talking about this in extremes. The reality is, every situation is going to be different, and every fighter is a little different as well. A new hungry guy, or an old skilled guy with nothing to lose are going to be more than willing to take fights at the last minute. Guys that have a lot to lose are the sort that might get the call, but are unprepared for a title shot. They don't want to blow their shot at the champ when they are unprepared because they may not get another shot. Why blow your wad against the champ unless you are fully prepared and trained for him? In cases where a contender goes down, and the 2,3 or 4 guy aren't down to fight, then you should pick the guy who will sell the most tickets. But, you should have something like this rule, or some other rule available to the public so they can scrutinize it and understand it. Have a rule, or philosophy go guide you, rather than the seat of your pants. |
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St. Catharines Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,603
vCash: 75 |
I do agree that the UFC way is more fan pleasing. To bring up another hockey analogy, I remember the Devils in the 90's. Incredibly boring style of hockey, but they were the Champs. I didnt really care much to watch them, so I missed a lot of Cup games. If the Leafs had been there, I wouldnt have moved. If The Leafs win The Cup, I bet television records across Canada will be broken. More people would watch game 7 of The Leafs than watched the Moon Landing. But the Leafs usually suck and don't even make the playoffs. So I'd love to see them there, but they would not be a legitimate threat, challenge, or even challenger.
I guess I would prefer to see the athletes earn their shots in the Octagon, in the ring, on the ice, then behind the microphone, so to speak. |
|
|
|
#55 |
|
It won't affect the test
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Chuch of What's Happening Now
Posts: 10,695
vCash: 500 |
It doesn't need such a thing. The mandatory contender rule was devised for boxing in an attempt to force increasingly elusive(read: cowardly) boxers to fight the best contenders around.
In the UFC because UFC fighters do not possess the privilege of being so evasive, the UFC often makes the best fights that everyone wants to see. |
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Da Bafroom brah!
Posts: 7,191
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
I think brackets are great, maybe a grand prix? There should be intelligible ways people can follow fights. I even like it when Dana White has guys fight off for a shot at the champ.. Watching Cain go through Bigfoot, then JDS was incredible T.V. and incredible fighting. I think that some sort of rational system that people can follow, will get more people to follow MMA It makes things interesting, chance is a funny thing. |
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: sweden
Posts: 6,300
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
At 01:30 [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] |
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
vCash: |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | ||
|
East Side MMA
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 8,958
vCash: 553 |
Quote:
Quote:
I still don't think you understand the fight game, and it's nothing I can fix. There is no #1 Contender at LHW, and if you think there is I'd like to see you draw up a list because Mixed Martial Arts doesn't operate that way.... The fans decide who is the best, who has earned and who deserves what. |
||
|
|
|
#60 | |||
|
Rationalist by default...
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,895
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Because you know better perhaps ?? ![]() Because Sonnen is not an opportunistic cunt ?? ![]() Quote:
GSP: Is he the second greatest MMA fight ever? [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Please enlighten me, were does it mention P4P ? Because like the OP said in the first post of that thread, since Fedor is #1 and now retired, it has to be a P4P discussion right ? Quote:
And just BTW, since Gustafson just beat Shogun, I don't see why they could'nt offer the fight to him....ohh yeah, that right, Sonnen is getting the title shot because he can tweet and talk... |
|||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|