|
|
|
#76 |
|
Ain't No Stopping Us Now
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,799
vCash: 527 |
It's the same thing here is Australia, you can play Rugby train for a couple of years to make over a million plus the lifestyle or train in obscurity for years in hope of a payday that may never come.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 22
vCash: 500 |
cause they dont wanna work hard...either fat bitches...or very poorly skilled weight lifters...boxing takes training an hard work...seems like the only ones that take that semi seriously are the klits...
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 703
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Good one. I have posted similar economic reasons.The poor-lower middle in the US are much better off/less "hungry" than people in similar circumstances in other countries. There's not many w/the "eye of the tiger" in the US anymore. The "they're in the NBA/NFL" argument is lame. 1) there were big, athletic men in the NBA/NHL in the so called golden era of US HWs in the 70s. Why wasn't that reason brought up then? Ans - b/c it was US fighters who were dominating the HW div ![]() 2) there are many 1000s of very athletic and big HW US men who will never make it in the NBA/NFL or other pro team sports. Where the hell are they? Ans - not training to be a fighter |
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
Quote:
How come this crap didn't apply to the lower weight classes |
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 703
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: England
Posts: 11,911
vCash: 75 |
All the excuses come pooring out.
Just look at the match making America have not had a dominant world champ for some years now and after looking at the current scene, I started looking at possible reasons. Possibly Americas beat HW prospect at this time is Deontay Wilder who is 27-0 (27KOs). Looks impressive, but who has he fought? All the fighters below in far less fights have fought higher calibre opponents. D Price who has only had 15 fights, is ranked way above Wilder and fought better competition and is fighting T Thompson next. It makes me think its all to do with bad match making. Now look at how much tougher the European HWs are matched on the way up Tyson Fury in 20 fights has fought undefeated 16-0 Pajkic, undefeated 14-0 Chisora, undefeated 13-0 Nascimento, undefeated 12-0 Power and McDermott twice, Rogan and K Johnson Derek Chisora in 17 fights has fought undefeated 14-0 Fury, undefeated 16-0 Helenius, D Williams and S Sexton twice, V Klitschko, D Haye and agreed to fight W Klitschko Robert Helenius been away for a bit, but in his first 17 fights has fought L Brewster, A Levin, S Peter, S Liakhovich, D Chisora and undefeated 12-0 G Tony Kubrat Pulev in 17 fights has fought 27-0 Ustinov, 32-1 Dimitrenko, Sprott, Vidoz, Guinn, in his 5th fight he was beating Skelton!!! Could it be because of soft matching on the way up, why American HWs have tended to crumble when facing decent European opposition who seem to be matched alot tougher on the way up? What do you think? |
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 703
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Why don't you give me your crap reasons The lower wt classes have a pool of millions of top athletes to draw from. Besides, if it wasn't for football (soccer to you), drawing away most top athletes from boxing in Europe and other non US areas - the US wouldn't be doing as well in the lower wt classes either ![]() The above makes more sense than the "all the top US HWs are in the NBA/NFL" bs argument. You'd think there was less risk to become a HW fighter from Europe than in the US - like they fight with 30oz gloves or something in other parts of the world
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,500
vCash: 1000 |
America isn't the only country on the planet that has other sports you excuse-making crybabies. All of the ridiculously overrated American champs of the past should have asterisks next to their names because they were really only local champs, not world champs. They never competed against Eastern Europeans, Cubans, Africans, etc. in the pros. Eastern Europeans are already taking over boxing. We're dominating the higher weight classes and will eventually take over the lower weight classes too. We're also dominating the amatuers. Most of those great amatuers will become great pros. This is just the beginning of the Eastern European domination. The heavyweight division is better than it's ever been. There are more countries participating than ever before. The Klitschkos have dominated and cleaned out a global heavyweight division. All of the best heavyweights from America, Britain, Eastern Europe, Cuba, Africa, etc. have been defeated by the Klitschkos. The Klitschkos are the two greatest heavyweights of all time. They're real world champs, unlike those disgustingly overrated overhyped American frauds of the past. Eastern European fighters are superior. The Klitschkos would dominate any era. |
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,461
vCash: 973 |
Quote:
Or genetics. Yeah, that's it. Americans are genetically inferior to Europeans. Oh wait ......... |
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 33,587
vCash: 524 |
Quote:
Truth is, if you're a small but very athletic person, boxing is one of the few options you have. |
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,354
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
The helmets and pads contrasted against gloves and a bare face create an illusion of safety that isn't there in reality. But, since parents still perceive the myth as the truth, they still gladly sign their kids up for football while being horrified at the prospect of them becoming a boxer. |
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Fabulous, darling!
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A cut above my left nose
Posts: 3,109
vCash: 500 |
I find this wage earnings argument people keep bringing up quite ridiculous. How many top boxers of the past originally got into the sport because they thought it would be an excellent career choice for future financial stability? Fuck all would be my guess. Now how many first got into the sport because they came from broken homes, were bullied at school, wanted to escape a life of crime, grinding poverty etc?
Truth is, if you have the athletic or mental ability to make money in an easier fashion, then boxing's not going to be your first port of call. Not in the US, not anywhere. And call me cynical, but if you're in a position to be worrying about scholarships and pension plans then you probably don't have the mentality to be a top boxer in the first place. |
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Fabulous, darling!
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A cut above my left nose
Posts: 3,109
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Yeah, in the US maybe. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|