|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,581
vCash: 1022 |
I think not. The best we will see his Kell Brook against Matthew Hatton. Eddie steers his fighters to the top and avoids huge domestic fights.
If I want big domestic fights, then you know Frankie is involved : Haye Chisora, Murray Mitchell, Murray Burns, Groves De Gale, Haye Macrenneli, Clev Bellew. Edward Hearns is going to bore us to death steering his fighters to WBC/IBF final elimators that noone is arsed about. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 426
vCash: 500 |
Yeah but Matchroom cards wipe the floor with any other UK promoters, so he's not all bad. How often have ****** and Maloney etc given us dreadful undercards? And what Domestic showdowns have we missed because of Hearn can I ask? None that I can think off.
Shit thread, you whinging bitch |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 11,327
vCash: 15000 |
Which big domestic fight has Hearn avoided? That's a blatant lie.
You are right to suggest that many big fights won't happen though. Frank, Hearn and Hennessey all have TV deals, which means they aren't going to let their fighters appear on other networks but to single Hearn out for this issue is laughable. The fact is, we aren't gonna see Bellew/Cleverly II, DeGale/Groves II or Fury/Price. There are too many issues with TV for these to happen, and it's the fault of all the promoters or none of them. They're all in the same position. Hearn is putting on the best shows in Britain. That obviously annoys some people, though I'm not sure why any boxing fan would dislike the promoter who delivers the best results for us. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Devon
Posts: 1,957
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,581
vCash: 1022 |
Quote:
Lets see Teddy Hearns put his money in his pocket and deliver us Barker Macklin in 2013. Eddie will keep talking shite, he has more chance of Khan McClosky 2, than Brook Khan. No way will he matchmakers Frampton with Quigg. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Realist
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 14,987
vCash: 238 |
The UK scene for domestic match-ups, in my opinion, is pretty shit as of right now. There aren't many massive match-ups that we're craving. Even Price-Fury... it's not a fight where we believe both guys are at some great pinnacle in a 50/50 fight.
Even with Frank's guys, what 'big domestic showdowns' are there? Most of the names mentioned in each fighters stable are more or less going onto the point where they have to be in world level fights, rather than domestic dust-ups. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Writer, fanatic
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,448
vCash: 500 |
I'm a sceptic about Hearn, but I believe he's tried to make Frampton-Quigg and Quigg's team aren't interested. Ideally it'd be nice to see a balance between the two approaches.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 11,327
vCash: 15000 |
Quote:
Like I said, what big fights has Hearn got in the way of? As for Brook and Khan, maybe they'll fight, maybe they won't. I think if they end up both having world titles it would be a huge bout but there's no real reason for it to happen before then. Lets not forget that they aren't even in the same ****ing division right now, so calls that Hearn is ducking the bout are premature, to say the least. The problem Hearn has got is that Hatton, Maloney, Hennessy, Frank and others won't work with Sky. That makes it incredibly hard for Hearn to be involved in big domestic fights. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Writer, fanatic
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,448
vCash: 500 |
In fairness, jack, that is partly Eddie's fault. Sky kicked everyone else off, so they don't see why they should help Sky or Eddie make money.
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 11,327
vCash: 15000 |
Quote:
It's not Hearn's fault the other two didn't buck their ideas up. They were all told the same thing and only Eddie delivered. Had Maloney and Hatton improved their product, things would have stayed the same and it'd be three promoters on Sky instead of one. However, Maloney and Hatton didn't do that so they're getting punished for it now. I can understand Hatton and Maloney being annoyed that they were kicked off Sky but their frustrations should be with themselves. They are the ones who blew it. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,824
vCash: 500 |
Froch vs Bute
Froch vs Kessler Barker vs Martinez Brook vs Alexander Rees vs Broner Bellew vs Chilemba Frampton vs Martinez All fights in the past year where a Matchroom fighter is in a 50-50 or higher fight against. Of all the promoters in the UK Hean is the most aggressive and ambitious in terms of matchmaking. If anything Eddie is overly confident with his fighters. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,824
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
If Hatton comes up with something big for Quigg, Vassell, Buckland etc like he did for Martin Murray fair enough, but if those guys sit on the shelf for 6 months and then fight a Brazilian for the WBA Inter something at a leisure centre in Oldham your looking at problems. In terms of Hearns fault for being kicked of Sky, thats a soft arguement. They only have themselves to blame. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|