|
|
|
#1 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Posts: 340
vCash: 500 |
My eyes are telling me a different story altogether!! Anyone know what their heights really are, Broner seems to have a significant advantage in this area .... |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,242
vCash: 1000 |
Heights are clearly not Boxrec's forte. Noticed it last week. They have Selby at 5'5" and Lindsay at 5'7" !!
All I know is it's incredible Broner is getting down to this weight and actaully weighed in below Rees. To look at him he looks closer to a middleweight with those shoulders |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: More money, more cash, more hoes.
Posts: 2,459
vCash: 1000 |
rees & baby jake matalala should be lining up for the NBA according to boxrec
& the referee has to watch he dont step on them if they ever fought |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vae Victis
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Liverpool, England
Posts: 2,018
vCash: 416 |
Yeah, Rees is about 5'3 and Broner about 5'7 or 5'7 and a half.
Rees' height is what makes him so awkward. He ducks low and his head catches his opponents and can cause cuts. It's kind of dirty but at the end of the day if you can get away with it then do it. The Americans wouldn't think twice about headbutting their opponents, just look at Andre Ward. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,850
vCash: 547 |
rees is 5"4 and Broner is 5"7, that's what ****** says in the sun. I've actually read articules on boxrec reffering to rees as %24 I'me sure, so how they can not get it right on the profile is daft
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|