Leapai gives an Eff you to Khoder as well

[Francis75]

Originally Posted by shanemfr

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Good on him for telling what a peice of shit Khoder is

The ironic thing in that article is that they are having a go at the "circus" of boxing with regards to Khoder Nasser etc etc but at the same time stating that Leapai is the number 10 heavyweight in the world.

[stiflers mum]

Originally Posted by Francis75

The ironic thing in that article is that they are having a go at the "circus" of boxing with regards to Khoder Nasser etc etc but at the same time stating that Leapai is the number 10 heavyweight in the world.

[MidniteProwler]

Originally Posted by Straight Shoota

For Soliman, a professional fighter for 16 years, there is an immense sense of frustration over the way Khoder Nasser has stained his sport.

"These circus fights get more publicity than me beating Felix Sturm in Germany," Soliman said, "And Felix was one of the biggest names in world boxing with something like 20 world title bouts.

"People who really know boxing know that these football fights are a farce but unfortunately a lot of people get sucked in."

Yet he fought Mundine (along with Khoders circus) 3 times? Fucking hipocrit

Agree, Soliman is a clown, he is so butthurt Mundine kicked his ass, also his win over the washed up Sturm was a robbery...

[buster007]

Originally Posted by Straight Shoota

No,if you read the article it bags the footy players along with Nassers promotion.Soliman has tuned in and agreed
Mundine was a Nrl players if memory serves me correct and was managed by Nasser for all 3 fights against Soliman
Guess it was alright for Sam to cash in on the 3 fights right?

they r talking about when these guys pull swifties, or make the sbw vs gurr a ppv.
if they put on the legit cards then nobody will be too disappointed cause it would be good for oz boxing.

its not hypocrytical at all.

[stiflers mum]

Originally Posted by MidniteProwler

Agree, Soliman is a clown, he is so butthurt Mundine kicked his ass, also his win over the washed up Sturm was a robbery...

That was in no way a robbery. An argument can be made Sturm deserved the verdict but it was no outlandish robbery.

[MidniteProwler]

Originally Posted by stiflers mum

That was in no way a robbery. An argument can be made Sturm deserved the verdict but it was no outlandish robbery.

It was a shocking decision IMO massive robbery

[IrnBruMan]

Originally Posted by Straight Shoota

For Soliman, a professional fighter for 16 years, there is an immense sense of frustration over the way Khoder Nasser has stained his sport.

"These circus fights get more publicity than me beating Felix Sturm in Germany," Soliman said, "And Felix was one of the biggest names in world boxing with something like 20 world title bouts.

"People who really know boxing know that these football fights are a farce but unfortunately a lot of people get sucked in."

Yet he fought Mundine (along with Khoders circus) 3 times? Fucking hipocrit

I don't recall any part-time footballing boxers on any of the 3 Soliman vs Mundine undercards, so how do you deduce Soliman fought in Khoder's circus 3 times?

[Straight Shoota]

Originally Posted by IrnBruMan

I don't recall any part-time footballing boxers on any of the 3 Soliman vs Mundine undercards, so how do you deduce Soliman fought in Khoder's circus 3 times?

I was waiting for your disagreements since you always have one ill break this down for you nice and simple..Khoders circus-promotion is questioned in that article,soliman agress with this,yet fought under it 3 times,got paid by the guy 3 times,I also believe its been refered to as the mundine circus(see Taylor match) mundine is known and only known in boxing because of his RL background...Wherrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreee in those points am I incorrect and fr you to disagree??

[IrnBruMan]

Originally Posted by Straight Shoota

I was waiting for your disagreements since you always have one ill break this down for you nice and simple..Khoders circus-promotion is questioned in that article,soliman agress with this,yet fought under it 3 times,got paid by the guy 3 times,I also believe its been refered to as the mundine circus(see Taylor match) mundine is known and only known in boxing because of his RL background...Wherrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreee in those points am I incorrect and fr you to disagree??

The article is about the SBW Botha fight - see the headline? It says "Circus gives sport a black eye as SBW bout makes Australian boxing an international laughing stock".

It goes on to talk about what a joke the SBW Botha fight was and how it stained the reputation of Australian boxing. See?


"But this week Leapai and most of Australia's leading boxers have come out swinging in defence of their sport after Williams and Nasser made Australian boxing an international laughing stock."

As well as quoting Leapai, they quote Billy Dib and Sam Soliman, both of whom refer to the SBW Botha fight. Soliman says:

"These circus fights get more publicity than me beating Felix Sturm in Germany," Soliman said, "And Felix was one of the biggest names in world boxing with something like 20 world title bouts.

"People who really know boxing know that these football fights are a farce but unfortunately a lot of people get sucked in."

Where does he mention Mundine? He's referring to the SBW Botha fight.

You seem to have made an illogical leap of faith in connecting the 3 legit fights Soliman had against Mundine to the SBW Botha farce simply because Nasser used to manage Mundine.

So either you're saying that Mundine's whole career was a circus just so you can have a go at Soliman for being a hypocrite, which would then make you a hypocrite because you're a Mundine nuthugger and reckon he's the bees knees, or you don't know what you're talking about and are just another butthurt Mundine nuthugger doing the old "Leave Brittney ALONE!!!" thing again.

True story

[Sox]

Originally Posted by stiflers mum

That was in no way a robbery. An argument can be made Sturm deserved the verdict but it was no outlandish robbery.

I'd need to watch it again, but I thought Sturm won, and felt it was a bit of a robbery when the decision was announced.

[Brownbomber1]

Originally Posted by stiflers mum

That was in no way a robbery. An argument can be made Sturm deserved the verdict but it was no outlandish robbery.

Sturm dies in the arse badly in the later stages, I think it was a fair enough decision, Close fight.

[MidniteProwler]

Originally Posted by Brownbomber1

Sturm dies in the arse badly in the later stages, I think it was a fair enough decision, Close fight.

If an Aussie fighter gets dudded us Aussie fans are quick to complain, we should just admit it when one of our own gets a gift, no way Soliman won that fight

[Francis75]

Originally Posted by MidniteProwler

If an Aussie fighter gets dudded us Aussie fans are quick to complain, we should just admit it when one of our own gets a gift, no way Soliman won that fight

I didn't actually watch the fight myself. How did you score it mate ?

[stiflers mum]

Originally Posted by MidniteProwler

If an Aussie fighter gets dudded us Aussie fans are quick to complain, we should just admit it when one of our own gets a gift, no way Soliman won that fight

Well the judges and compu-box stats disagree. It was close Sturm wilted badly.

[Sox]

Originally Posted by Francis75

I didn't actually watch the fight myself. How did you score it mate ?

I had it 116-114 to Sturm.
A few of the middle rounds were really close and I scored them a draw.