Is there any HW not named Wlad that legitimately beats Malik Scott?

[bremen]

Originally Posted by Abdullah

Last night was a robbery! Malik Scott won handily. Though, I am not ready to say he is the second best heavyweight out there.

Listening to BJ Flores much? Glazkov was the aggressor he deserved a nod.

[LuckyLuke]

Originally Posted by bremen

Listening to BJ Flores much? Glazkov was the aggressor he deserved a nod.

You can only give credit for effective aggression. Glazkov was able to cut the ring off and to get close to Scott many times but he dindt land much on Scott.

[gdm]

Wlad, Vit, Haye, Fury, Pulev, Povetkin. Wouldn't be surprised if guy like magomedov ko's that big tatood pussy.

[gdm]

Originally Posted by bremen

Listening to BJ Flores much? Glazkov was the aggressor he deserved a nod.

Despite fighting like a pussy he won the fight clearly.

[JohnH]

Originally Posted by LuckyLuke

Towers?
Go watch his last fight!
He looked like complete dog shit! Tony almost koed him and if the ref would have stopped the fight you couldnt complain about that.
Sparring =/= pro fight.

I predicted that Price is going to get ktfo and i am saying that Towers is also going nowhere.
Fury is by far the best prospect GB has.

I watched Towers' last fight and I still say he would beat Scott.

[Fnatic]

Originally Posted by zxcvbnm

I cannot think of anyone else who could beat Scott legitimately after last night's fight.

Not gonna lie that was a smooth performance, I had it 98-92 for Malik don't understand how anyone could score that for Glazkov.

[zxcvbnm]

Originally Posted by JohnH

I watched Towers' last fight and I still say he would beat Scott.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Hercegovac]

Originally Posted by John Galt

Neither fighter was hurt during the fight, Glazkov was the aggressor. Flores built Scott up all night and made it seem that Scott was dominating, but Scott did little in the ring. If the sound was off, people might have a different opinion about who won the fight.

Somewhat agree with this, the commentators were insanely biased, Scott lands a jab and they go crazy, Glazkov barrels in with good body shots, and they're still talking about that jab.

With that said though, Malik did win a close fight. His footwork is solid, great reflexes, and a smart tactician.

Would love to see him agains pulev though. Would be interesting to see him deal with Pulev's aggressive style and nasty demeanor.

[Benitom3]

GGG brutalizes him inside the distance

[TerryESB]

Tyson Fury has already said that he could beat Wlad Klitschko

[JohnH]

Originally Posted by JohnH

I watched Towers' last fight and I still say he would beat Scott.

Not sure what you're laughing at. Scott is overhyped, if you can't see that, then that is your problem mate.

[Lunny]

Originally Posted by JohnH

Yes Richard Towers, let's not get too carried away with Scott.

"I worked with Richard in the Klitschko camp. He has tremendous power, great movement and a awesome jab. And at times gave the Champ a thing or two to think about. A true gentlemen with many great years ahead of him."
Jameel McCline

Towers is awful

[Vidic]

Originally Posted by LuckyLuke

Richard Towers?
Who went life and death against a bitch slapping french journeymen?

[Berliner]

Originally Posted by Lunny

Towers is awful

Yes he is! Just a big big boxer with a lot of strength

[zxcvbnm]

Originally Posted by JohnH

Not sure what you're laughing at. Scott is overhyped, if you can't see that, then that is your problem mate.

I'm laughing at the fact you rate a guy who was battered from pillar to post by a feather-fisted can who has a reputation as the most heartless quitter in the whole HW division. The only reason Towers got the W in that fight was because Tony had a heart of glass and randomly conked out for no reason.