|
|
|
#2 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,794
vCash: 0 |
Davis was a natural talent, Mamby showed what you could with amazing dedication. It would all depend when they met.
Pre 1982 I would fancy Mamby WU15; but in 1982 or 83 Davis WS15. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
Posts: 139
vCash: 1000 |
Unless one of these guys would knock the other guy out I think you would have a different winner every time they fought. I looked at the quality of opposition both faced and I thought wins and losses it was close but with the edge towards Saoul. Based on that "S.W.A.G." I pick Mamby 5 out of 10 times.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Sweet Saoul could do it all. He successfully defended his title against Termite Watkins by taking him on the inside. Duran's body attack couldn't put Mamby down, or take him out. His discipline was amazing. His chin and toughness were legendary. His form was as sound as any boxers of his era. He retired the younger DeJesus when Esteban was 28. (Only world champions Antonio Gomez, Antonio Cervantes, and Roberto Duran were able to defeat Vita. Only Duran had ever been able to stop him within 15 rounds, before Mamby took him out in 13.)
Saoul was far better against Watkins, Goins, and McGirt than Howard was. Mamby also officially won four times over the 15 round distance, was flagrantly robbed of a fifth 15 round decision over Muangsurin in Thailand (a verdict even Saensak's hometown supporters found disturbing), and was arguably robbed of a sixth 15 round decision when Leroy Haley was awarded his title. Howard went 15 rounds once, and Jim Watt outpointed him handily. If Mamby chose to punch with lethal intent, he was certainly capable of doing that on occasion. That's important, because I think Saoul would sent Howard to the deck at least once. Davis may have been the fastest man in boxing during his career, but he wasn't nearly as technically proficient as Mamby was. With each at their best, Saoul still secures a clear cut win on the scorecards. Mamby UD 15 Davis, Jr. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,403
vCash: 1000 |
No offense but I don't consider Mamby all that.
His fight with Dejesus consisted of alot of holding before he finished him off in the 13th.And Dejesus was no longer in his pime. Mamby appears to me to be very awkward with a sound chin. I mean I have the Dejesus bout and I don't consider that a boxing masterpiece.I mean there were so many clinches in that bout it wasn't funny. Mamby wouldn't be able to deal with Davis's speed.And Davis movement would present Mamby with huge problems. Davis defeats Mamby by decision. |
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Quote:
You do have an advantage on me, in that I haven't seen the match for many years, but I also recall Mamby demonstrating a very fine jab in that performance. I believe Saoul had the defensive skills to blunt Howard, and sufficient speed and power to reach Davis and drop him. I also think Mamby's proven endurance over the 15 round distance would come into play late. Not only was Howard outpointed by Watt, Larry Hazzard has essentially admitted that Vilomar Fernandez was robbed of a decision that was rightfully his, and that their match was the one in which Howard should have sustained his first official defeat. |
||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,403
vCash: 1000 |
But Mamby didn't hit hard.And he paced himself due I think to his age.In his title defences he scored 0 knockouts and 0 knockdowns except for DEJESUS who was damaged goods.
What do you consider Mamby's 5 best performances? |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Vilomar Fernandez was the poster boy for not hitting hard. If he could drop Howard, then Saoul certainly had the combination of speed and power necessary to score a points building KD or two. I have seen Mamby score knockdowns with both his cross and his hook. His punching technique with both would have been sufficient to drop Howard, who in no way, shape, or form would have countered with a KD of his own, not against the steel chinned slickster Mamby. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,403
vCash: 1000 |
Brooks was way done before he met Mamby.
Mamby was a pros pro but is a little overrated. When people talk about boxer's who had great jabs Mamby is never mentioned.Partly because he is overlooked but also because truthfully his jab wasn't anything to write home about. Pernell Whitaker Kostya Tsyzu JC Chavez Edwin Rosario Aaron Pryor Zab Judha Do you think Mamby could have beaten any of those boxers? My point is while Mamby was a good pro I think he was a full level below the elite.And I don't mean any disrespect because boxers like Mamby are among my favorites-boxers- not blessed with blazing speed or numbing power-boxers that trained endlessly and learned there trade.Techincaly sound. |
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Quote:
Because Rosario sometimes faded late (especially in the first Ramirez tussle), and Mamby had the chin, defensive skill, and 15 round experience, I believe Saoul could have decisioned Chapo over that distance, as Howard in fact came within seconds of doing so over a shorter 12 round span. I would have loved to have seen Mamby and Pryor face off in a 15 round Jr WW title unification bout in 1981. Because Aaron was a wild and wide open headhunter, and both seemed impervious, I was sure it would be a distance contest with no knockdowns. Could Mamby have frustrated Pryor enough to gain a decision, or would the Hawk's swarming prevail over Sweet Saoul? It was my hope that the two of them might produce an undisputed championship for Arguello to challenge for. (At the time, I believed that Mamby had a better chance to decision Alexis than Pryor had of beating Arguello, especially considering what Vilomar Fernandez had been able to do to a peak Alexis.) Quote:
What do you consider to be Howard's best wins? My money would be on Johnny Lira and Greg Coverson. Against the smart tough Lira, (who was actually training other boxers while competing himself) at altitude (in Stateline, Nevada), he boxed flatfooted to conserve energy, slipping WC Pug's shots in mid-ring, and countering with the hardest jab I remember him deploying from that anchored position he maintained with his legs. A flawlessy efficient performance. |
|||
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,403
vCash: 1000 |
I must say your knowledge of boxing is very impressive.
You know I thought Davis had an impressive performance against Meldrick Taylor.Termite Watkins was a pretty good performance as well by Davis. You know your boxing and I would like your opinion on a couple of boxers who seem not to be apperciated by the masses. Sumbu Kalambay-How would you rate his footwork and to whom would you compare his footwork to?Someone once told me his footwork reminded him of Walcott. Michael Nunn(the early years)-BERFORE he won his 1rst title.I think he was almost unhittable when he fought in that safety first style.What is your opinin?I watched Nunn make alot of good pros seem like beginners. |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,700
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Nunn certainly parlayed his combination of height and southpaw stance into a package which helped secure a great deal of early shutout wins. The kayo loss Nunn sustained was frustrating for me on so many levels. Michael's boxing skills where clearly superior to Toney's at that stage of their careers, yet he succumbed to the result of a single hook (and Nunn was on the deck for ten full seconds after that first knockdown, but received the benefit of a slow count). Huh? How does a southpaw of Nunn's caliber get tagged out with a single hook to the head? (A cross down the pike, or even a hook to the body I could understand, but a hook to the head?) While this was a terrific come from behind one punch kayo for Toney, I was kind of disgusted with the fatigue he displayed upon the match's conclusion. This wasn't a nearly 34 year old Ali following the end of 14 rounds at Manila, or a 28 year old Larry Holmes with one good arm dropping to the canvas with exhaustion after first dominating, and then slugging it out with Norton over a full 15 rounds, but a 22 year old kid supposedly in top condition for his first title match, who kayoed an opponent that was dominating him, with a single punch after just 10-1/2 rounds of action (hardly an extended epic performance), and HE was wiped out? (I figured then and there that Toney was no kind of 15 round fighter.) I'm truly sorry for that outburst Cobra, but I really am a hard-core 15 round snob. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
vCash: 1000 |
I have to say both you guys, Cobra33 & Duodenum, have made this an immensely interesting thread.
It's always great to expand on one's knowledge of so-called "second tier" fighters like Saoul Mamby, Howard Davis Jr. Sumbu Kalambay definitely figures in this group - and while he never springs to my mind when contemplating great fighters or being in great fights when I find myself watching him I tend to study him more closely because there's a degree of subtlety to his skills that only comes through a constant honing of one's craft. He did a nice job on Mike McCallum in their first outing and how many boxers can say that of their career. Very slick operator was Sumbu. How long have you been following the game Duodenum? Your comments are always insightful and full of interesting and relevant details that we don't normally come across on these boards. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Good To The Last Punch
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: "...The Land of Dixon and Langford..."
Posts: 6,096
vCash: 18000 |
First, let me echo the sentiments of Doc McCoy Well done, sirs.
And, now, back to the orginal topic... Mamby was tricky, teak-tough veteran, who was almost impossible to catch with anything flush, and who generally relied on stamina to take over in the later rounds of the fight. He didn't hit hard, but he could still wear you down and hurt you in the later stages of the fight (he still demonstrated this knack when he was well past his best- witness his upsets of Glenwood Brown and Larry Barnes). Given that a fighter like Jim Watt (who was very similar to Mamby in terms of talent level, and, to an extant, in terms of in-ring approach) could outwork Davis over the fifteen round limit, methinks Mamby could do the same as well. Davis could box beutifully, and would probably hold a lead going into the championship rounds, but Saoul would accelerate in the later rounds, possible score a late knockdown, and emerge with a clear decision. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|