|
|
|
#16 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
Easy Question!!!!!
1. Ali by decision 2. Holmes by decision 3. Louis by decision (possibly late stoppage 8+ rds) 4. Foreman brutal KO 4 rds 5. Marciano KO 6 6. Dempsey KO 2 7. Frazier KO 8 8. Lewis KO 10 9. Liston KO 4 10. Holyfield KO 9 11. Bowe KO 11 |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I never sleep, cuz sleep is the cousin of death
Posts: 16,432
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Depending on the bareknuckle rules, involving clinching, wrestling etc, I am not sure how to call a Sullivan/Tyson matchup, but based on boxing skills, Tyson takes him out within a round as well, and as a matter of fact, that'd be my verdict on that one under any ruleset as well. I just don't get how people think guys of that era had anywhere near the skillset of modern fighters(or fighters from around the 30's/40's and on) when the difference on film is so clear. Last edited by Sweet Pea; 03-01-2008 at 06:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Boris Christoff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 11,752
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Guys that would have decent shots would be Holyfield, Ibeabuchi & Bowe due to styles. A peak Holmes has a good shot also, but I'd favour Tyson by TKO all the same, it depends on if Holmes can weather him. Lewis, if he had a better chin, would be my clear pick over Tyson, but being as it stands, I can't take him because Tyson's going to get him due to his chin. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Boris Christoff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 11,752
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I think Tyson would get him early also, just like you said you thought Louis would get Foreman early with quick combinations. |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I never sleep, cuz sleep is the cousin of death
Posts: 16,432
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Boris Christoff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 11,752
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Somewhere gone off dat lean!
Posts: 926
vCash: 1000 |
Muhammed Ali
Sonny Liston George Foreman Larry Holmes Evander Holyfield Lennox Lewis Jack Johnson David Tua Ike Ibeabuchi Joe Frazier All beats peak Tyson. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,374
vCash: 1000 |
Anyone picking Dempsey or Marciano over Tyson needs to remember that the only natural sub-190lb fighter he ever fought, Michael Spinks (who actually weighed over 200 on fight night and had grown into a proper heavyweight), got absolutely MASHED.
I know, Spinks is no Dempsey/Marciano, but just how often did Tyson fight with a size advantage? He'd have thirty pounds on Marciano and Dempsey. |
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,058
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
They would fight him ugly but their tactics might pay off. |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I never sleep, cuz sleep is the cousin of death
Posts: 16,432
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
What does Frazier losing to Foreman have to do with Tyson losing to him? Tyson is MUCH better defensively, much quicker, a better outboxer, and more powerful. He'd undoubtedly be landing a lot more than a guy like Lyle(who had Foreman hurt badly) and he wouldn't be getting hit nearly as much as Frazier. Foreman's lack of skill and defense would be his downfall. Tyson has the speed to pop in and out and the accuracy over Frazier, along with the defense. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|