|
|
|
#31 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,956
vCash: 1000 |
It was the LINEAL WORLD Championship of the world. They had NO RIGHT to with draw Callahnan because he defended it against Kid Berg. Berg was a GREAT fighter. Berg was perhaps the best choice at the time of the defense. They withdrew because they wanted the title to STAY In America. And not in the hands of a brit. No right to withdraw. No right at all. So it is a WORLD Championship because of the unjest stripping of Callahnan. and any man that beats Berg, is the rightful champion, and so forth.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
"The Boxing Blade magazine held a vote whereby the fans named Pinky Mitchell as the inaugural champion, and we start our lineage with that democratic decision." It is not historically correct, the only people who recognized Ross as Champion at 140lbs were the people running the Illinois Boxing Commisson... |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,956
vCash: 1000 |
And the Lineal line, Callahan beat Divodi for the NBA and New Yourk titles which means in a Alpha sense in that day and age, he was the WORLD Championship of the world. He was only lacking the BBC title. They WITHDREW from Callahan when he decided to fight Jack Kid Berg.
Look at Lewis, they withdrew from him the MOVEMENT he unify all the titles, and he still was the WORLD Heavyweight Championship of the World when he lost to Rahman. The title just pass down on to Rahamn all though we had Ruiz and a few other guys claiming to be champs. |
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,956
vCash: 1000 |
Ross was the lineal champ, Pinky was the FIRST Champ, poll or not, and Callahnan beat him. Than Callahnan beat the other climates to be the unfiy champ. You will not amitted it. Who ever beat Callahnan from THAT point on, will be the Lineal and rightful champ.
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
There would be no need to have a boxing forum if that was the case! |
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 229
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,956
vCash: 1000 |
Because Ross beat the man who beat the man. Callahnan was the Champ when he unify the NBA and New York titles which count in thsos days. He was the CHAMP. And his win over Pinky took out any real content on who the champ was in that divison. Who ever beat Callahnan was going to be the next lineal champ. And so forth and so forth. The NBA strip Callahnan because he defended it against a Brit. And YOU WILL Agree that was unfair>??
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,787
vCash: 708 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,956
vCash: 1000 |
Rahman beat Lewis who unify the title in the Holyfiled, Moore, era. After the 2nd Holyfiled fight Lewis was the MAN. Same reason applies to Rahman which made Rahman the lineal champ in terms of Ross. Or Briggs when he beat Foreman.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|