|
|
|
#1 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,313
vCash: 1000 |
I think a case can be made for both alternatives actually (even if most probably know what I personally think), so I would like to hear your opinions on this.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest Star for Team Taff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Spion Kop
Posts: 44,504
vCash: 1000 |
It helped it, it allowed a new generation of heavys to establish a reputation. The wins against Foreman and Frazier look (are!) more impressive than if Ali had of met them as an established champ defending against undefeated Olympians.
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,313
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
But don't you think that Ali would have had a very long reign as champ if not for the exile? I mean, he could have beaten both Louis's and Marciano's records. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The firestarter
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: philadelphia museum of art
Posts: 1,194
vCash: 1000 |
hard to say i dont think any exile should help a fighters legacy there will be arguements for both, but im saying no
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Guest Star for Team Taff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Spion Kop
Posts: 44,504
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
So I guess from a cold stats point of view the break harmed Ali (it certainly deminished his skils) but when you look back at his complete career I think it helped him become what he his. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,313
vCash: 1000 |
When do you think that his reign would have ended if not for the exile? Against Frazier, Norton, Holmes, someone else? Would he have retired undefeated?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MAB.
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, England
Posts: 36,388
vCash: 842 |
From any standpoint, it hurt his legacy. In all probability, Ali wouldn't have lost for a long time, and the Frazier first would have been more competitive. It hurt his legacy.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Guest Star for Team Taff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Spion Kop
Posts: 44,504
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
MAB.
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, England
Posts: 36,388
vCash: 842 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Guest Star for Team Taff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Spion Kop
Posts: 44,504
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Guest Star for Team Taff
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Spion Kop
Posts: 44,504
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 277
vCash: 1000 |
I say it hurt him physically...but legacywise it helped him.If the Foreman fight had happened before exile,it would'nt have had the impact it did in Ali's career IMO.Even tho I think,an absolute prime Ali would have made George look silly in the ring.Too fast and too busy for George....would have got gassed just chasing Ali around that ring.
And so yeah,the exile helped his legacy for sure. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,313
vCash: 1000 |
But let's say that he never went into exile and ruled supreme for 14 years until he lost to Holmes in 1978 with 30+ defenses under his belt (I'm not saying he necessarily would reign that long, but if he did), could anyone dispute his standing as the nr. 1 HW? Wouldn't he have a good claim to be seen as one of the very best p4p, even?
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|