|
|
|
#2507 |
|
Big Boss 1935-2014
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A Hero Forever Loyal To The Flames Of War, Rests in Outer Heaven
Posts: 7,578
vCash: 157 |
Chavez usually comes in at 180, the fact that Martinez couldn't hurt him shows that Chavez had a good chin (we already knew he had but not to that extent) and the fact he was a LHW.
Yeah Sergio got caught in the 12th of an exhausting performance staying on his toes, turning Chavez almost every minute of every round while throwing 908 punches. At 37. How people are saying Chavez was still inexperienced is bizarre to me. |
|
|
|
#2509 | |
|
GolovKING
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,132
vCash: 2577 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2510 |
|
Big Boss 1935-2014
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A Hero Forever Loyal To The Flames Of War, Rests in Outer Heaven
Posts: 7,578
vCash: 157 |
Didn't know about the injuries.
Makes the performance even sweeter. |
|
|
|
#2511 | |
|
GolovKING
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,132
vCash: 2577 |
Yeah..
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2512 |
|
Awesomeizationism!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,991
vCash: 1000 |
I wouldn't go that far. Martinez certainly isn't great, but he's a very good fighter. Good puncher, quick hands, awkward angles. he got caught late by a 180+ lbs man but managed to hang on. Chances are he'd slice Hamsho up.
It's time to bring Golovkin up front though. I'm very interested to see how Martinez goes about trying to deal with him (and vice versa, of course). |
|
|
|
#2514 |
|
GolovKING
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,132
vCash: 2577 |
It'll only be worse. Naturally Chavez is going to let his hands go more early and often and he'll get a lot more in return for it.. Sergio will coast and take rounds off knowing he can toy with Chavez as he pleases. There won't be a deliberate hyper-macho Scarface moment in the final frame either, if it gets there.
|
|
|
|
#2515 | ||
|
The guy in shades
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Don't switch the blaaaaaaaade on me, BFE
Posts: 3,023
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
Quote:
It's like the most boring chorus of the worst song ever sung. By some Mormon tabernacle choir afterhours band. Chief Taunty Tongue and Dances with Dogs and getting a good shot that wobbled him aren't going to take the shine off of Martinez for embarrassing everyone who tried to take what's his without a fight in the first place. That's what matters, in the here and now where he's regarded as one of the best active fighters alive. And before "it's because everyone sucks now" stop, drop, roll, take a deep breath, and pop a few geritol and nap it off. You'll be fine. |
||
|
|
|
#2516 | |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,057
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
My G-Man reference was because he was also a massive weight cutter, with a half decent jab who could bang. Barker, Macklin, Drinzsuruk, all absolute dog shit. Especially the last one, an overrated, over protected WBO 'titlist'. |
|
|
|
|
#2517 |
|
Lowering Post Count
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brunoilia, Hehsland
Posts: 51,289
vCash: 7500 |
I consider Barker, Macklin, Razor to all be good fighters.
F-level fighters: Paid losers, plain and simple. "Bad." D-level fighters: Fighters with usually barely winning records at best (over F-level fighters mostly), function to build modest early experience for decent prospects. They all have day jobs, you only know them if you literally know them in person. Even if they wound up on ESPN when you were watching, you still don't know them. "Poor." C-level fighters: The worst might make a few TV spots, have an okay record on paper, are dedicated also-rans, honest journeymen. The best of which are usually fighters with some name of some kind, sometimes national champs or well-faded former titlists, occasionally still fringe contenders in some shitty abc ranking or recent abc challengers. "Okay". B-level fighters: The lowest of which is just a little too formidable to call them average. Solid. Flawed but some things that stand out. The highest of which can be just shy of great or borderline greats for their time. "Good." "Very good." "Excellent, but shy of historical weight." A-level fighters: The lowest of which might be a flash in the pan of elite names. The highest of which is an ATG. "Great" "Special." "Sugary" Flea's, probably goes something like: Sulaiman's vaginal yeast The shit which is shat from utter dog shit Utter dog shit Andre Dirrell meh yawn okay overrated good Semantics, you know. |
|
|
|
#2518 |
|
มวยสากล
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: @ferociousflea
Posts: 44,057
vCash: 75 |
Not bad squire, good work
OBVIOUSLY I DON'T ACTUALLY MEAN AS WORTHLESS AS A DOG TURD but I followed Macklin or Barker coming up the ranks and neither are genuinely World class. Before anyone says anything, Sturm is a solid european level fighter and has been for a while. That's not a criticism either. Macklin did not beat him IMO but somehow, like Martin Murray is now seen to be 'World class' before he had a competitive fight with him. For everyone that says ' old timers are given preferential treatment' they'll rate a current fighter pretty highly and not really criticise him at all and give him a free pass. Everyone thought Jaime Garza was the next big thing at one point ya' know? Last edited by Flea Man; 09-17-2012 at 03:40 AM. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|