Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Oct 6, 2010.


  1. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Thats good ****boy!:good Gotta anymore lame insults for me??:rofl
     
  2. Serenata

    Serenata Fit und geimpft Full Member

    6,141
    1
    Oct 13, 2007
    Wich fights besides Reid did he CLEARLY loose?

    Answer:

    None

    Some real close fights he also might have lost but not clearly...
     
  3. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,659
    706
    Oct 17, 2009


    it was a genuine compliment :thumbsup
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    This guy is a non-stop embarrassment! :lol::lol::lol:
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,364
    3,455
    Dec 11, 2009
    You must be real butt hurt by me to keep bumping old threads of mine, a sure sign of how hurt you are :lol:.
    Still good time to bring back this thread
    At MW and SMW respectively Ottke on paper looks to have had a more impressive reign :good.
    Popkins dont duck, explain how Hopkins on paper looks to have had a better reign.
    This content is protected
     
  6. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    Both boring as duck**** to watch, however Hopkin's resumé much better.
     
  7. Peter Brit

    Peter Brit Member Full Member

    468
    0
    Jun 4, 2010
    Ottke, never won all those 21 fights.
    You are an arsehole even mentioning his name. His career is the most disgraceful evidence of cheating in boxing. You want people to quick watching boxing show his fights. Germany set the bar highest with home decision. they should be utterly a shamed of themselevs. In fact they should have been banned from holding championship fights for years due to the cheating.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    I'm not remotely interested in who has the better resume "on paper" (which would obviously be Hopkins anyway), but only interested with who has the better resume "in reality" - :nut

    Why does Hopkins have the better resume?

    Erm, because he beat better fighters and looked much better and more convincing doing it. :deal

    Hopkins' mw unification win over p4p#2 40-0(34) 3-weight champion and HOF class fighter Felix Trinidad is light years ahead of anything Ottke ever done.

    The quality of opposition that Hopkins dominated (WBC champ Keith Holmes, Glen Johnson, William Joppy) is better than the quality of opposition that Ottke really struggled with.


    How many wins in B-Hop's mw reign are close, controversial, disputed, and some would say "gift" decisions?

    How many of Ottke's are?


    Debate over. :smoke
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,364
    3,455
    Dec 11, 2009
    This content is protected
    . I said on paper :lol:

    Knew you would pull another duck, little sissy Popkins :lol:
     
  10. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    Peter Brit I agree with you, the Germans have made an artform out of home town decisions, even if one wins via ko, they will construct a way to take it from you. There should be sanctions against them, once a title is achieved they almost refuse to leave German borders,
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol::lol::lol:

    What a ****ing cretin!!

    This guy wants to talk about resumes "on paper", rather than the actual quality of the resume in reality!!!!

    Even for you Bailey, this is without question the lamest, most transparent, most pathetic, most catastrophically tragic cop-out of your miserable ESB career!!!

    Hang your head in shame, because yet again you have been found guilty of a...



    This content is protected
     
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,364
    3,455
    Dec 11, 2009
    You pulled a
    This content is protected
    whichever way you want to try hide it :lol:.
    So are you going to atleast try and answer sissy :|
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol::lol::lol:

    This is potentially your most EPIC FAILURE yet.

    So you do not want to discuss who had the better resume, is that right?

    I'm just getting it straight here, you do NOT want to discuss who had the better resume.

    Yes?


    :)lol::patsch)
     
  14. qwert

    qwert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,544
    68
    Dec 22, 2009
    Surely Bailey's threads are all just ironic? Noone can seriously think all this ****.
     
  15. Peter Brit

    Peter Brit Member Full Member

    468
    0
    Jun 4, 2010
    The point of my comments about Ottke vs reid is the fact Ottke coached the ref throught the fight. He tells the ref to warn Reid for punching him correclty, immediately afterwards ottke butts reid, punches him in the kidneys and tells the ref. while holding reid, reid head is dangerous.

    It is not like it is just a bad ref or poor judges. Ottke actually was aloud to ref. the fight as he wants as well. It is so aplauding it is unber believeable. Even if he was sugar ray robinson he would be an utter disgrace.

    To this day Ottke name is a black mark for boxing. The germans would not get half the stick they do for home down decision if it was not for Ottke. There is a difference between judging in mexico and europe. european go more for amateur style scoring where clear punches landed are ahead of power punches. So Ottke style would look bad to most Americans and a lot of his fights he would have lost in the USA. However there are two or three you could not give him even by the european standard. Then you have Ottke vs Reid to rub it in.