Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

If you speak to him, you will immediately no there is not a trace of irony in that guy. He's as true a ****wit as anyone I've ever encountered in my life, so horribly twisted by bias that it functions as a type of disability and results in all these ludicrous threads.

 

It's close both fought bums at home with home town advantage.

 

Yeah, Hopkins wasn't one of those champions who always went to the challenger's hometown to defend his belt. Good call. Why would he make good money fighting in the USA where the TV networks pay big money and where most of his opponents were from, when he could've toured around fighting for much less cash and poorer TV exposure?

You would think that after feeling he was cheated out of a title belt while fighting at high altitude in Ecuador, he would've been dying to fight in similar countries again. Weird.

 

You telling me that your going to debate and not be the usual little sissy who keeps ducking the questions .
Well you have hopefully read the first page, get back to me when you are ready :smoke

 

The fact that both Ottke and Joe C were doing virtually the exact same thing at the same time shows that both feats are aomewhat watered down. I mean, really? Two records at the same time in the same division?

 

Explain how Wales and Germany are similar to Ecuador.

 

at least ottke fought fighter of his size

 

:rofl At least Hopkins didnt need hometown decision for a win!

 

I strongly suggest you don't give up your dish-washing job.