Wlad will get caught in the first round just like Ruiz got. but won't get up

only a ****ing HOMER/FANBOY believes that coward was hurt....thats the thing with injuries..a "back injury" is almost impossible to prove...and he knew that....
Haye ran his ****ing mouth for almost 4 years , and will pay finally.

and if you put in credibility in faceoff...or stare down pictures, or weigh in photos...youre an idiot..that means ****.,....

 

he lost to jones, yeah, but not toney... do you remember what happened there? got it in one brain box! he cheated. used steroids.

he did beat someone decisively in his reign...kirk johnson. got that one wrong didn't you?

 

If scores of 85-84, 85-84, and 86-83 all the while faking low blows to get a DQ win is decisive to you then you need to quit watching Boxing and start watching Ice Skating or Gymnastics or something. The guy didn't have one ****ing clear win in his whole title reign. Not one. :roflatsch

 

John Ruiz was ****ing awful. Its still hilarious watching his 'fight' with Tua.

 

I am sorry did I just read you right? Back injurys are almost impossible to prove this depends on what type of testing you have done, And honsetly with todays technology I am sure Vitali could have had supporting documents... and again you talk about almost 4 years of running his mouth on Hayes part, Vitali was gone for three years running from Rahman....

Regarding face off, I am seeing an utterly shook Wlad, ones whos nerves are at their peak, something none of us has seen before, this is not the Wlad Klitschko you know so dont sugar coat it, regarding stare downs or pictures or weigh ins I agree, but in Wlads voice in his eyes, the Shakey~ness you hear in his voice, He is done.

Next week be round here, please dont bring excuses with you, Wlad is getting knocked the **** out...

 

John Ruiz is awful, he is not easy to fight, there are only three fighters that had an easy time with john, Tua, Jones and Haye....

 

forget what the score cards were - ruiz was in full control of the fight and was winning hands down. if you don't think so, then you are among a select few.

ruiz faked lows blows during his career, i won't dispute that. but not in this fight. they were clear low blows from johnson. he wanted out of the fight. if you think other wise, then you REALLY NEED TO GO AND WATCH THAT FIGHT AGAIN!

 

The "select few" being the 3 judges who were judging the fight.

I can't believe that Haye fans are trying lamely to pump up Ruiz as a good win. ****ing embarrasing.

Just admit that Haye hasn't done anything at heavyweight.

 

my post was accurate.

it was also a good win for haye. not great, but good. he also knocked ruiz out. only tua was able to do that.

P.S i suppose you think the three judges for the Alexander vs Matthysse fight were credible as well?

 

Wlad got up 3 times against Peter, he goes down easy from bombs, but he gets up lots too, as it doesn't take a sustained battering to drop him.

 

You gotta be kidding me!! atsch First, what Wlad does concerning holding is nowhere NEAR as excessive as what Ruiz did. It is one thing to use holding as a SUPPLEMENT to actual boxing, as Wlad does, it's quite another to use it as a REPLACEMENT for actual boxing ability, as Ruiz did.

Secondly, to compare Ruiz's highly debatable "wins" - where, in most of which, he should have been disqualified or lost a decision (Golota, Holyfield) - to Wlad's definite victories is ABSURD. Wlad either decisively beats or destroys his opponents. Ruiz? In most cases, he should have lost.

Ruiz was a FRAUD. A glorified clubfighter who wouldn't have SNIFFED the rankings without the influence of King, and would have been disqualified for excessive holding - or other disreputable tactics like faking low blows - in virtually all his fights above the journeyman level.

 

Wlad holds just as much as Ruiz did when Ruiz was active, dont try to pull the wool over my eyes kid, we have seen Wlad fight, and its basicly Jab jab grab, no different than John Ruiz..

 

:roflatsch

Again, Ruiz did not have one decisive victory in his whole WBA title reign. Not a single one. He held over 250 times against Oquendo and Golota. Wlad has NEVER come close to that.

 

The only difference between Ruiz and Wlad is their nationality other than that their style is nearly a carbon copy...
and if you really took the time to count how many times Ruiz held your a ****ing idiot... seriously...
you dont have to agree with me in this regard, its just my view on Wlad ever since he got blasted out by an old man part time fighter sanders and by Brewster who lost to Eitienne he has become Ruiz like... thats a fact.

 

why did you have to dig so deep? whyyyyy?


for the record i have switched side and now i am some kind of a wlad fan..

go wlad :good