Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

Calzaghe v Hopkins

One card had Calzaghe up by 3!

One card had Calzaghe up by 5!

One card had Hopkins up by 1!

The cumulative points difference after TWELVE ROUNDS: 7 points!



Hopkins v Echols II

Three cards had Hopkins up by 11!

The cumulative points difference after NINE ROUNDS: 33 points!



If you don't understand the difference between these two situations, you're even more of a mongtard than everyone already thinks you are!!



Oh, and you have exposed as commenting on Hopkins-Echols II when you've never even seen it!!!!!!

This content is protected

 

And, inevitably, we come to the part where Bailey can't think of anything else to say because he has been thoroughly proven wrong, embarrassed and mastered by me.

Yet again, you are the king of ...

This content is protected

:smoke:smoke

 

Another troll thread by bailey.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGCUuApI9Og[/ame]

bailey's new euro rap.:-(

 

:happy:happy:happy

Bailey has been taking a ****ing slaughtering all day on here so far!

Long may it continue!!

 

Please no one with a brain can compare a legendary fighter like Hopkins with the paperbeltholder Sturm.

 

I've checked through the thread, and I can report that no-one with a brain has. The only person who has is Braindead Bailey.

 

Thank´s :good

 

oh my lord! i had to click on it to see if this is true.

 

Why you trying to introduce me to your mum man, have some shame keep your mother out of this

Discuss boxing. Unless your mother is on boxrec dont involve her:good

 

LMFAO!:rofl

This dude has to be the dumbest motha****a I've seen...Just as I figured, Sturms is just another D level fighter...Gotta love how this clown tries to big up Sturm.

And to think Bailey said that Sturm would beat Hopkins!:rofl:rofl

 

Dumbass!:rofl:rofl:rofl