Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

simple answer. cause B hop is american and is a legend. not to mention he ranks higher than calzaghe.

 

Hopkin's being American dont mean **** in this discussion

Most definatley, legend of the game, mastered it to the tee thats why he is still handing out lessons today.

See my next thread

 

He posseses EURO power, that's all Failey needs to know...

 

yea i agree where hopkins is from is ireelevant but for a simpleton like failey it is evverything. based on the fact that he is jealous of america he attempts to put down their fighters for no reason whatsoever

 

failey tries to be subtle with his bias and stupidity but this one is quite blatant lol

 

Hopkins struggled with judges, not fighters. he didn't whoop them as bad as he whooped everyone else, but he still won the fights aside from jones. bailey's just being a ***** again. anything to discredit hopkins. Hopkins > coke boy

 

maybe you should take some time to read the thread question.

when bailey asked "who's is better?" he was talking about resume's. not who was the better fighter.

 

Your a world rated stupid ****.

 

lets all point at failey and laugh

 

You have to be joking.

 

Failey's a clueless tit who just discovered Joe C right as he retired. He's trying to play catchup, give the slow ****** a chance to catch his breath FFS!

 

Ok, I'll answer you.

Sturm's entire resume hangs on a close fight with Oscar, whom Hopkins stopped.

Sturm was KOed by Javier Castillejo - a good fighter - but the problem is he ran like a ***** in the rematch and was awarded a gift by the judges.

What else has he done, besides cherrypick? Hopkins had a close fight with Roy Jones, and that loss alone wipes out Sturm's entire resume. But he also beat Glen Johnson, and I can stop there because Sturm's resume can not possibly hold up to that.