Tyson v Jones ... products of weak Eras and or divisions

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by fitzgeraldz, Jun 28, 2011.


  1. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Jones Jr? ... his biggest win was and will always be Hopkins[/quote]

    Man, you got to stop.

    Holmes is the same man that went on 4 years later to beat A PRIME MERCER who is Wlad's best win, ya dick suckin *****.

    And Jones Jr best win is JAMES TONEY.

    Man, you don't know **** about boxing.
     
  2. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Roy Jones has some good competition missing from his record. Just because his record is fairly weak doesn't mean the era was.
     
  3. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    +1

    Jones was picking his opposition very carefully. Same with Tyson actually. Tyson was one of the most protected and over hyped fighters of all time. Those fighters that did not lose to him during the pre-fight conferences either gave him hell or beat him. He was a very talented man, with powerful punches and quality defense, but his heart was his biggest weakness. Holyfield's grit and determination, transplanted to Tyson, would have made the greatest heavyweight of all time.
     
  4. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Absolutely nothing you've said show that these fighters were inferior to a declining Mercer? All you've done is show that you can spout irrelevant crap while periodically using big letters to further highlight the worthlessness of your posts. The fact that you've highlight a sparring session without ironic context shows how utterly stupid you are.

    I laugh at people like you that are so goddamn dumb and yet, bless ya, actually believe they are boxing fans. It might be beneficial to take your dumb butt away from the forum and watch a few fights. Just a thought....
     
  5. eagleskins

    eagleskins Active Member Full Member

    1,478
    0
    Oct 5, 2010
    Anyone that says Tyson's era was good is a total ******. His era was good in the mid 90's when he was getting destroyed by everyone. The late 80's was the worst era of HW boxing ever. Tyson never beat anyone that wasn't a bum.
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    If Tysons era was weak , what does that say about this ****-filled era.
     
  7. Arranmcl

    Arranmcl Arran Full Member

    3,219
    2
    Jan 2, 2011
    Yeah, and he did that with a broken right hand.
     
  8. zarman

    zarman Guest

    I disagree, I believe Tszyu never reached his true potential because of it
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Tyson was champion Nov. '86 - Feb. '90 in a weak heavyweight division.

    Roy Jones Jr.'s win against James Toney in 1994 was one of the biggest wins in boxing in the whole decade. But after that he fought mostly complete soft touches.
     
  10. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Tyson was the only person to KO Holmes and Spinks who were both very good fighters. Maybe not as good as Ali because he could give up in close fights but he was robbed of his peak.
    Roy Jones beat a few greats and is possibly the best light heavy ever imo.
    Oscar and Tito were not all time great middle weights, Hopkins has never beaten an ATG.
    Calzaghe beat Eubank and Hopkins who are ATG's and was avoided by Collins as well.
     
  11. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Tucker, Pinklon and Biggs were quality boxers back then and Tubbs had very fast hands for a HW. Holmes was still useful.

    I think they'd all beat the Klitschko's at their best.
     
  12. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    There were phenomenal fighters around with Jones like Eubank, McClellan, Benn and Nunn.

    I think he avoided McClellan in '93-'94, and Eubank and Nunn in '97-'98.
     
  13. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011
    Tyson has two good wins, old Holmes and old Spinks. The simple fact of the matter is that the best fighters in Tyson's age bracket were Tyson, Lewis, Holyfield and Bowe. Tyson fought 2 of those over 3 fights and got destroyed every time. These are the real honest facts about Tyson.
     
  14. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Well yes they're the real honest facts, but visually the real truth is that Tyson was clearly nothing like the same fighter that destroyed Pinklon, Biggs, Tubbs and Holmes and out-jabbed peak Tucker and Smith.

    Even a 60% Tyson was able to destroy Bruno, Williams, Tillman and Ruddock and be one second away from beating tall talented Douglas.
     
  15. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    6,024
    17
    Mar 21, 2007
    This era is much better than the late 80s.

    The late 80s had Tyson, then nothing, then a semi retired LHW Spinks, retired Holmes, Tony Tucker, and a couple of also champions like Bonecrusher Smith and Tony Tubbs.

    Today we have two dominant champions in Wlad and Vitali, a dangerous semi-active puncher in David Haye and the solid Tomasz Adamek. After them there is still some decent guys like Robert Helenius, Alexander Povetkin, Odlanier Solis, Chris Arreola and Eddie Chambers. Then there is some unproven talent in Boytsov, Perez and Ortiz. The HW division is pretty deep atm.