David Haye is lights years ahead of Herbie. Anyone with even a basic knowledge of boxing should know this
Why ? Because he's been hyped more ? Haye's heavyweight resume = Tomato can Tomasz Bonin 37 year old journeyman Monte Barrett 36 year old Valuev 38 year old Ruiz 39 year old Audley Actually, if you look at it objectively, Hide's weak accomplishments at heavyweight stack up pretty well against that load of shite. :deal Haye's best win at heavyweight is a repeat of what a 46 year old Holyfield did a year previous. Explain how Haye is miles better than Hide .....
you don't like david haye + you know nothing about herbie hide = you think hide is better. am i right?
Exactly. Sometimes Haye looks just great, other times amateurish. This fight I hope will answer some questions about David Haye.
No, I think they are about the same. That is, so far, on proven ability. If Haye can beat Wlad then I'll be the first to say he's much better than Hide. :deal But at the moment IT'S ALL JUST HYPE. There's no substance to it. Haye's done NOTHING to put him above Hide. The only reason people can actually say "he's much better than Hide" is because they are swallowing a load of hype. It has absolutely nothing to do with what he's done in the ring. The facts are the facts. His HW resume is no better than Hide's best wins. His HW wins are over has-beens and fighters who are not near world class. This is just the straight facts, without the hype.
this is all about why david haye isn't good...not why herbie hide is. you barely mention hide or his record at all. so...i'll stand by my earlier comment. you don't like haye. you know **** all about hide. equals: you think hide is better. am i right? yes. :yep
He was, yet three fights later he lasted until the 11th with Ruiz. The 12 years later Ruiz lasted until the 9th with Haye. Do I have a point here.....naaaaah