Monzon vs. McCallum

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by laxpdx, Jun 30, 2011.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Calzaghe beats Monzon at 168 for sure in the battle of the 2 men who fought old men and bums
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,563
    Jul 28, 2004
    :rofl..Really PP,..you're otherwise a very good, knowledgeable poster..but this is
    This content is protected
    ...it's enough to say "to each his own" and "everyone's entitled to his opinion" in your defense.
     
  3. CassiusClayAli

    CassiusClayAli Active Member Full Member

    1,050
    14
    Mar 3, 2010
    What a Rocks avatar is Leonard Nimoy?? Nothing wrong with that. "Ahh, Mr. Scott, I understand you're having difficulty with the warp drive"
     
  4. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    You have a point, but in this forum it's preferable to prove those people wrong, or atleast present a differing opinion, with good analysis on a fighter's strengths and weaknesses.

    Good as McCallum was, he wasn't the most talented when it comes to his footspeed and defensive reactions. The thing that makes this a more even match-up though is that Monzon himself was not the fastest of middleweights. This allows McCallum to use his techniques to full extent, without being outdone by laser right hands that he could not see coming before reacting, making him more hesitant. Monzon probably does drive home some big right hands though, as being open for that punch was a definite weakness of McCallum's throughout his career.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    True but those fighters were already discussed so often that that shouldn´t be necessary.


    In many ways they are evenly matched. McCallum might even have the slightly better technique while Monzon packs more power. Like I wrote before Monzon will win this because he will dictate pace and range. I don´t know many fighters who were as good as him in that and McCallum ain´t one of them.
     
  6. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,153
    Oct 22, 2006
    I am for that, as long as the term 'Great' is banned too. As so many people abuse it, with fighters that were merely excellent, to those who were basically good...
     
  7. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    547
    Feb 17, 2010
    Where would Duke McKenzie come into it?
     
  8. goat15

    goat15 Active Member Full Member

    926
    0
    Nov 10, 2010
    so you've written off the seventies and eighties as a weak era for middleweights. that's a long time...
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    547
    Feb 17, 2010
    Middleweight was never genuinely weak until the mid-90s and onward imo
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,285
    13,316
    Jan 4, 2008
    Wait a sec here! I haven't said that. Against Hearns, I'd probably make him a favourite, just as Steward does. Over 15 at least. Over 12... Very hard to say. Tough, tough fight at any distance. Against Monzon I won't make a pick, since I've seen too little of him. Against Leonard... Very, very hard to say since we saw little of prime Leonard at 154 and nothing of him above that. So I won't make a pick here either.

    I think McCallum at his best at MW beats Leonard at his best at MW, but I don't rate that Leonard nearly as highly as I rate the WW version.
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,285
    13,316
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't argue this. I was just giving my 2 cents on McCallum as a crowding fighter in general.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,285
    13,316
    Jan 4, 2008
    You're so predictable it's ridicolous. I won't speak for Teeto, but when he had the "respectable trolls" as the most annoying feature on this forum you're one of the posters I instantly thought of.

    You bring so much in form of opinion and so little when it comes to original, informed analysis. PowerPuncher is such a superior poster to you that it's beyond funny. And still you have all this attitude. High nose attitude from mediocre people is one of the most annoying things in the world, and it goes for this forum as well.
     
  13. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
  14. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I'd assume McCallum would have to attempt to rely on his skills closer up, perhaps with a good body attack and and his powerpunching arsenal. Briscoe may not have been a good equivalent, but I only used it as a general strategy comparison.I see a smaller man trying to box Monzon at middle range as being an exercise in futility given the man's reach and honed straight punching. The best ways to deal with a guy like Carlos IMO is either to outspeed and outwork him on the outside or to crowd and smother him up close and get him tangled. As this pertains to McCallum his best chance would be to apply fast pressure with a good strong body attack. I don't see him playing the slickster to great success, so there it is.

    And itry, wide decisions don't necessarily reflect a prediction of a beatdown or an ass whipping; it could simply mean that a man won the majority of rounds, and I think i'd expect Monzon to.
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    Same height and reach bro